Literature DB >> 22226627

Erlotinib or best supportive care for third-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world cost-effectiveness analysis.

Ian Cromwell1, Kimberly van der Hoek, Suzanne C Malfair Taylor, Barbara Melosky, Stuart Peacock.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Erlotinib has been approved as a third-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in British Columbia (BC). A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare costs and effectiveness in patients who received third-line erlotinib to those in a historical patient cohort that would have been eligible had erlotinib been available.
METHODS: In a population of patients who have been treated with drugs for advanced NSCLC, overall survival (OS), progression-to-death survival (PTD) and probability of survival one year after end of second-line (1YS) were determined using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Costs were collected retrospectively from the perspective of the BC health care system.
RESULTS: Incremental mean OS was 90 days (0.25 LYG), and incremental mean cost was $11,102 (CDN 2009), resulting in a mean ICER of $36,838/LYG. Univariate sensitivity analysis yielded ICERs ranging from $21,300 to $51,700/LYG.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that erlotinib may be an effective and cost-effective third-line treatment for advanced NSCLC compared to best supportive care.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22226627     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  10 in total

Review 1.  An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Simon Walker; Tracey Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economic Considerations in the Use of Novel Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Hamzeh Albaba; Charles Lim; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Licensed Drugs Used for Previously Treated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Negative Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Gallacher; Peter Auguste; Pamela Royle; Hema Mistry; Xavier Armoiry
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of targeted oral anti-cancer drugs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fabrice Smieliauskas; Chun-Ru Chien; Chan Shen; Daniel M Geynisman; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The Impact of Molecularly Targeted Treatment on Direct Medical Costs in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  June-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Bhumsuk Keam; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Young-Joo Kim; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 6.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Ansgar Lange; Anne Prenzler; Martin Frank; Heiko Golpon; Tobias Welte; J-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  The economic value of liquid biopsy for genomic profiling in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Doreen A Ezeife; Eldon Spackman; Rosalyn A Juergens; Janessa J Laskin; Jason S Agulnik; Desiree Hao; Scott A Laurie; Jennifer H Law; Lisa W Le; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Barbara Melosky; Frances A Shepherd; Victor Cohen; Paul Wheatley-Price; Rachel Vandermeer; Janice J Li; Roxanne Fernandes; Aria Shokoohi; Richard B Lanman; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.485

8.  Update on the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on the cost-effectiveness of new agents.

Authors:  A Vergnenègre; I Borget; C Chouaid
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-04-10

9.  A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib alone versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line therapy for Eastern Asian nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Siying Wang; Liubao Peng; Jianhe Li; Xiaohui Zeng; Lihui Ouyang; Chongqing Tan; Qiong Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The comparison of outcomes from tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy in second- or third-line for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with wild-type or unknown EGFR status.

Authors:  Giuseppe Bronte; Tindara Franchina; Massimiliano Alù; Giovanni Sortino; Claudia Celesia; Francesco Passiglia; Giuseppina Savio; Agata Laudani; Alessandro Russo; Antonio Picone; Sergio Rizzo; Michele De Tursi; Elisabetta Gambale; Viviana Bazan; Clara Natoli; Livio Blasi; Vincenzo Adamo; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.