OBJECTIVE: The published data on the curative effects of comparing the once weekly paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (W-paclitaxel) with the standard every 3 weeks paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (S-paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were still controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the two regimens, a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: Medical databases and conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared W-paclitaxel with S-paclitaxel in patients with first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The following keywords were used: "paclitaxel", "weekly schedule" and "non-small cell lung cancer". Reference lists of original articles and review articles were also examined. The published languages and years were not limited. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were one-sided; statistical tests for effect estimates were two-sided. RESULTS: Five eligible trials involved 940 patients were identified. They were all published as full-text articles. The intention to treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that the ORR of W-paclitaxel regimens patients was 30.89% (143/463), whereas the ORR of S-paclitaxel regimens patients was 27.09% (123/454). The overall pooled relative ratio (RR) for ORR was 1.24 (95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.93-1.66; P=0.14) when W-paclitaxel regimens patients were compared with S-paclitaxel regimens patients. Although the patients with W-paclitaxel regimens had an similar OS and PFS in comparison with S-paclitaxel regimens (median OS was 9.8 versus 10.7 months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.00; 95%CI=0.86-1.17; P=0.99; median PFS was 5.2 versus 4.7 months; HR=0.90; 95%CI=0.79-1.03; P=0.13, respectively), the W-paclitaxel regimens led to significantly less frequent adverse events of hematological toxicities and nonhematological toxicities. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the W-paclitaxel is not superior than S-paclitaxel regimens. The paclitaxel-based chemotherapies given by every 3 weeks are still standard regimens. For patients, especially for the elder or the people with poor conditions who cannot tolerate the standard regimen, the weekly schedule can be considered.
OBJECTIVE: The published data on the curative effects of comparing the once weekly paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (W-paclitaxel) with the standard every 3 weeks paclitaxel-based chemotherapies (S-paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were still controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the two regimens, a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: Medical databases and conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared W-paclitaxel with S-paclitaxel in patients with first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The following keywords were used: "paclitaxel", "weekly schedule" and "non-small cell lung cancer". Reference lists of original articles and review articles were also examined. The published languages and years were not limited. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were one-sided; statistical tests for effect estimates were two-sided. RESULTS: Five eligible trials involved 940 patients were identified. They were all published as full-text articles. The intention to treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that the ORR of W-paclitaxel regimens patients was 30.89% (143/463), whereas the ORR of S-paclitaxel regimens patients was 27.09% (123/454). The overall pooled relative ratio (RR) for ORR was 1.24 (95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.93-1.66; P=0.14) when W-paclitaxel regimens patients were compared with S-paclitaxel regimens patients. Although the patients with W-paclitaxel regimens had an similar OS and PFS in comparison with S-paclitaxel regimens (median OS was 9.8 versus 10.7 months; hazard ratio (HR)=1.00; 95%CI=0.86-1.17; P=0.99; median PFS was 5.2 versus 4.7 months; HR=0.90; 95%CI=0.79-1.03; P=0.13, respectively), the W-paclitaxel regimens led to significantly less frequent adverse events of hematological toxicities and nonhematological toxicities. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the W-paclitaxel is not superior than S-paclitaxel regimens. The paclitaxel-based chemotherapies given by every 3 weeks are still standard regimens. For patients, especially for the elder or the people with poor conditions who cannot tolerate the standard regimen, the weekly schedule can be considered.
Authors: B Basu; M G Krebs; R Sundar; R H Wilson; J Spicer; R Jones; M Brada; D C Talbot; N Steele; A H Ingles Garces; W Brugger; E A Harrington; J Evans; E Hall; H Tovey; F M de Oliveira; S Carreira; K Swales; R Ruddle; F I Raynaud; B Purchase; J C Dawes; M Parmar; A J Turner; N Tunariu; S Banerjee; J S de Bono; U Banerji Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 32.976