Literature DB >> 22226571

Mucinous adenocarcinomas: poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Leonie J M Mekenkamp1, Karin J Heesterbeek, Miriam Koopman, Jolien Tol, Steven Teerenstra, Sabine Venderbosch, Cornelis J A Punt, Iris D Nagtegaal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mucinous histology of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been associated with poor prognosis, however this has never been assessed in large well-defined study populations treated with the current used systemic agents. We investigated the prognostic value of mucinous histology in two large phase III studies in metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included 1010 metastatic CRC patients who were treated with chemotherapy and targeted therapies in two phase III studies. Patients were classified according to the histology of the primary tumour in mucinous adenocarcinomas (MC) and non-mucinous adenocarcinomas (AC).
RESULTS: Patients with MC (n=99) were older, had more often a normal serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), extrahepatic localisation of metastases, larger primary tumour diameter and a higher T classification compared to patients with AC (n=911). A deficient mismatch repair system and BRAF mutations were observed in 17% and 22% of patients with MC, compared to 3% and 7% in patients with AC, respectively. Clinical outcome was investigated in both studies separately, showing a worse overall survival (OS), progression free survival and overall response rate in patients with MC compared to patients with AC. Patients with MC received less cycles of treatment compared to AC, but did not suffer from a higher incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity. In multivariate analysis, mucinous histology was as an independent negative prognostic factor for OS, resulting in a combined hazard ratio of 1.78 (95%confidence interval (CI) 1.35-2.35).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic mucinous CRC have distinct clinicopathological features and poor response to chemotherapy and targeted agents. The strong negative prognostic value of MC warrants the use of this pathological feature as a stratification factor for clinical trials in metastatic CRC. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22226571     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  60 in total

1.  Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype.

Authors:  N Hugen; C J H van de Velde; J H W de Wilt; I D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Clinical impact of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer of mucinous histology: a multicenter, retrospective analysis on 685 patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo Catalano; Francesca Bergamo; Chiara Cremolini; Bruno Vincenzi; Francesca Negri; Paolo Giordani; Paolo Alessandroni; Rossana Intini; Silvia Stragliotto; Daniele Rossini; Beatrice Borelli; Daniele Santini; Donatella Sarti; Marco B L Rocchi; Sara Lonardi; Alfredo Falcone; Vittorina Zagonel; Rodolfo Mattioli; Francesco Graziano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Nuclear expression of claudin-3 in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines and tissues.

Authors:  Yasunori Tokuhara; Tatsuya Morinishi; Toru Matsunaga; Manabu Sakai; Takayoshi Sakai; Hiroyuki Ohsaki; Kyuichi Kadota; Yoshio Kushida; Reiji Haba; Eiichiro Hirakawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Prognostic and predictive response factors in colorectal cancer patients: between hope and reality.

Authors:  Chiara De Divitiis; Guglielmo Nasti; Massimo Montano; Rossella Fisichella; Rosario Vincenzo Iaffaioli; Massimiliano Berretta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Molecular Pathways: Mucins and Drug Delivery in Cancer.

Authors:  Chinthalapally V Rao; Naveena B Janakiram; Altaf Mohammed
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  The Prognostic Implications of FIX and FLO Patterns in Mucinous Colon Carcinomas.

Authors:  Sulen Sarioglu; Guray Akturk; Selman Sokmen; Hulya Ellidokuz; Aras Emre Canda; Mehtat Unlu; Abdullah Haluk Sirin; Ozgul Sagol; Cem Terzi; Mehmet Fuzun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-06

Review 7.  Advances in the care of patients with mucinous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niek Hugen; Gina Brown; Robert Glynne-Jones; Johannes H W de Wilt; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Aberrant Expression of Calretinin, D2-40 and Mesothelin in Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Colorectal Carcinomas and Relation to Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis.

Authors:  Abd AlRahman Mohammad Foda; Amira Kamal El-Hawary; Hazem Hamed
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  WRN Promoter CpG Island Hypermethylation Does Not Predict More Favorable Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Irinotecan-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Linda J W Bosch; Yanxin Luo; Victoria V Lao; Petur Snaebjornsson; Geert Trooskens; Ilse Vlassenbroeck; Sandra Mongera; Weiliang Tang; Piri Welcsh; James G Herman; Miriam Koopman; Iris D Nagtegaal; Cornelis J A Punt; Wim van Criekinge; Gerrit A Meijer; Raymond J Monnat; Beatriz Carvalho; William M Grady
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  GNAS gene mutation may be present only transiently during colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Peter Zauber; Stephen P Marotta; Marlene Sabbath-Solitare
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2016-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.