Literature DB >> 22226261

Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department.

Michelle F Magee1, Carine Nassar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits for hyperglycemia are common and costly. Enhanced strategies for recognizing and managing patients with diabetes in the ED are needed. Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) testing is typically used to assess level of glycemic control in the 2-3 months preceding an office visit. In this article, we report on potential roles for point-of-care (POC) A1C testing in the ED for patients presenting with uncontrolled hyperglycemia.
METHODS: We enrolled patients presenting to an urban tertiary care hospital ED with blood glucose (BG) ≥ 200 mg/dl who were otherwise stable for discharge (n = 86) in a prospective, nonrandomized pilot study. Antihyperglycemic medication management, survival-skills diabetes self-management education, and health system navigation were provided. Followup visits took place at 24-72 hours and at 2 and 4 weeks. Point-of-care A1C testing was performed at baseline and at 2 weeks. Baseline A1C results were used by the ED physician and the educator to inform the patient of likely preadmission glycemic classification, and the potential role that the (diabetes mellitus) DM medication regimen assigned in the ED had in enabling overall progress in glycemic control at 2 weeks post-ED initiation of treatment.
RESULTS: At baseline, 50% of POC A1C values were >13%. Mean BG fell from 356 ± 110 mg/dl to 183 ± 103 mg/dl at 4 weeks (average decrease of 173.5 g/dl, p < 0.001). Mean A1C fell by 0.4%, from 12.0 ± 1.5% to 11.6 ± 1.6% at 2 weeks, p = 0.048. There were zero instances of day 1 hypoglycemia and overall hypoglycemia rates were low (1.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care A1C testing in the ED helped inform both the provider and the patient of likely prior glycemic status, including unrecognized or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, and allowed emphasis of the importance of timely diabetes self-management education and medication management in preventing acute and chronic complications. Followup POC A1C testing at 2 weeks was used to confirm early improvement in glycemic control postintervention.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22226261      PMCID: PMC3262710          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  11 in total

1.  Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.

Authors:  Catherine C Cowie; Keith F Rust; Danita D Byrd-Holt; Mark S Eberhardt; Katherine M Flegal; Michael M Engelgau; Sharon H Saydah; Desmond E Williams; Linda S Geiss; Edward W Gregg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Mayer B Davidson; Ralph A DeFronzo; Robert J Heine; Robert R Henry; Richard Pratley; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Advances in hemoglobin A1c point of care technology.

Authors:  Bruce W Bode; Benjamin R Irvin; Jeffrey A Pierce; Michael Allen; Annette L Clark
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05

4.  The relationship of plasma glucose and HbA1c Levels among emergency department patients with no prior history of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Robert A Silverman; Raymond Pahk; Michelle Carbone; Evelyn Wells; Ron Mitzner; Katy Burris; James R Kelson; Rosetta Grella; Harvey Katzeff
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Trajectories of glycaemia, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  Adam G Tabák; Markus Jokela; Tasnime N Akbaraly; Eric J Brunner; Mika Kivimäki; Daniel R Witte
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 17.152

7.  Estimated risk for undiagnosed diabetes in the emergency department: a multicenter survey.

Authors:  Adit A Ginde; Kate E Delaney; Rebecca M Lieberman; Stefan G Vanderweil; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population.

Authors:  Adit A Ginde; Enrico Cagliero; David M Nathan; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Detection of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetic states in high-risk emergency department patients.

Authors:  Michelle A Charfen; Eli Ipp; Amy H Kaji; Tawny Saleh; Mohammed F Qazi; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Judith Kuenen; Rikke Borg; Hui Zheng; David Schoenfeld; Robert J Heine
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Mary Rosedale; Michael A Pesce; Caroline Juterbock; Navjot Kaur; Joe DePaola; Deborah Goetz; Mark S Wolff; Dolores Malaspina; Ann Danoff
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience.

Authors:  Deborah Taira Juarez; Kendra M Demaris; Roy Goo; Christina Louise Mnatzaganian; Helen Wong Smith
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.168

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.