Literature DB >> 22225727

Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.

Dale J Gibson1, Robert A Davidson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Exposure creep is the gradual increase in x-ray exposures over time that results in increased radiation dose to the patient. It has been theorized as being a phenomenon that results from the wide-exposure latitude of computed radiography (CR) and direct/indirect digital radiography (DR). This project evaluates radiographic exposures over 43 months to determine if exposure creep exists and if measures can be applied to halt or reverse exposure creep trends.
METHODS: Exposure indices were initially recorded over 29 months between August 2007 and December 2009 from the intensive and critical care unit (ICCU) and the emergency department (ED) departments where manual CR exposures were used. The data from this period were then assessed and the exposure indexes (EI) values from the radiographic images were compared to the radiology department criteria of EI values between 1400 to 1800 as being in the optimal exposure range. EI values below this were considered underexposed and over this as overexposed. An intervention was required to be used in ICCU and implemented in January 2010 to halt a noted trend of overexposure. The EI value for each chest x-ray (CXR) was recorded in the patients' ICCU records and was to be used by radiologic technologists/radiographers in determine exposure factors in subsequent CXR. After the intervention, EI values were recorded and evaluated for an additional 15 months between February 2010 and March 2011.
RESULTS: Between August 2007 and December 2009, 17,678 ICCU CXR images and 69,327 ED x-ray examinations were evaluated for over- and underexposure. A trend was noted in ICCU that showed a significant increase (P = .023) in EI values from the beginning to the end of the evaluation. No such trend was seen in the ED EI values (P = .120). After the intervention in ICCU, the overexposure trend was halted.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure creep has been show to exist. It is surmised that this occurs where judgment to determine the correct radiographic exposure factors is needed when taking into account a large range of patient sizes. It has also been shown that providing radiologic technologists/radiographers with previous EI values for the same x-ray examination can halt a trend of exposure creep. Crown Copyright Â
© 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225727     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

Review 1.  European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose.

Authors:  Hamidreza Masjedi; Mohammad Hosein Zare; Neda Keshavarz Siahpoush; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki; Fatemeh Alavi; Masoud Shabani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Homogeneous Canine Chest Phantom Construction: A Tool for Image Quality Optimization.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Menegatti Pavan; Maria Eugênia Dela Rosa; Guilherme Giacomini; Fernando Antonio Bacchim Neto; Seizo Yamashita; Luiz Carlos Vulcano; Sergio Barbosa Duarte; José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda; Diana Rodrigues de Pina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Side marker creep: have radiographers changed their side marker habits?

Authors:  Michael Fuller
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-09-09

4.  Development of a zoomorphic test specimen for constancy testing on digital X-ray systems in veterinary radiology.

Authors:  Gerrit Pöhlmann; Matthias Lüpke; Christian Seiler; Patrick Wefstaedt; Jan-Peter Bach; Ingo Nolte; Hermann Seifert
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study.

Authors:  Haney Alsleem; Rob Davidson; Bandar Al-Dhafiri; Raghad Alsleem; Hussain Ameer
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 6.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Ching; John Robinson; Mark McEntee
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-07

Review 7.  Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.

Authors:  Ursula Mothiram; Patrick C Brennan; Sarah J Lewis; Bernadette Moran; John Robinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-05-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.