Literature DB >> 22225280

Position detection accuracy of a novel linac-mounted intrafractional x-ray imaging system.

Martin F Fast1, Andreas Krauss, Uwe Oelfke, Simeon Nill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors have developed a system that monitors intrafractional target motion perpendicular to the treatment beam with the aid of radioopaque markers by means of separating kV image and megavoltage (MV) treatment field on a single flat-panel detector.
METHODS: They equipped a research Siemens Artiste linear accelerator (linac) with a 41 × 41 cm(2) a-Si flat-panel detector underneath the treatment head. The in-line geometry allows kV (imaging) and MV (treatment) beams to share closely aligned beam axes. The kV source, usually mounted directly across from the flat-panel imager, was retracted toward the gantry by 13 cm to intentionally misalign kV and MV beams, resulting in a geometric separation of MV treatment field and kV image on the detector. Two consecutive images acquired within 140 ms (the first with MV-only and the second with kV and MV signal) were subtracted to generate a kV-only image. The images were then analyzed "online" with an automated threshold-based marker detection algorithm. They employed a 3D and a 4D phantom equipped with either a single radioopaque marker or three Calypso beacons to mimic respiratory motion. Measured room positions were either cross-referenced with a phantom voltage signal (single marker) or the Calypso system. The accuracy of the back-projection (from detected marker positions into room coordinates) was verified by a simulation study.
RESULTS: A phantom study has demonstrated that the imaging framework is capable of automatically detecting marker positions and sending this information to the tracking tool at an update rate of 7.14 Hz. The system latency is 86.9 ± 1.0 ms for single marker detection in the absence of MV radiation. In the presence of a circular MV field of 5 cm diameter, the latency is 87.1 ± 0.9 ms. The total RMS position detection accuracy is 0.20 mm (without MV radiation) and 0.23 mm (with MV).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluated motion patterns and MV field size, the positional accuracy and system latency indicate that this system is suitable for real-time adaptive applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22225280     DOI: 10.1118/1.3665712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Evemarie Ames; Frank Nuesken; Jan Palm; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  MRI-guided Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Paradigm in Adaptive Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Ricardo Otazo; Philippe Lambin; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Michael Baumann; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Katharina Bell; Marina Heitfeld; Norbert Licht; Christian Rübe; Yvonne Dzierma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Assessment of MLC tracking performance during hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using real-time dose reconstruction.

Authors:  M F Fast; C P Kamerling; P Ziegenhein; M J Menten; J L Bedford; S Nill; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Imaging dose and secondary cancer risk in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yvonne Dzierma; Katharina Mikulla; Patrick Richter; Katharina Bell; Patrick Melchior; Frank Nuesken; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.