Literature DB >> 22224751

Three-dimensional image quantification as a new morphometry method for tissue engineering.

Julie A Rytlewski1, Laura R Geuss, Chinedu I Anyaeji, Evan W Lewis, Laura J Suggs.   

Abstract

Morphological analysis is an essential step in verifying the success of a tissue engineering strategy where the presence of a desired cellular phenotype must be determined. While morphometry has transitioned from observational grading to computational quantification, established quantitative methods eliminate information by relying on two-dimensional (2D) analysis to describe three-dimensional (3D) niches. In this study, we demonstrate the validity and utility of 3D morphological quantification using two common angiogenesis assays in our fibrin-based in vitro model: (1) the microcarrier bead assay with human mesenchymal stem cells and (2) the rat aortic ring outgrowth assay. The quantification method is based on collecting and segmenting fluorescent confocal z-stacks into 3D models with 3D Slicer, an open-source magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography analysis program. Data from 3D models are then processed into biologically relevant metrics in MATLAB for statistical analysis. Metrics include descriptive parameters such as vascular network length, volume, number of network segments, and degree of network branching. Our results indicate that 2D measures are significantly different than their 3D counterparts unless the vascular network exhibits anisotropic growth along the plane of imaging. Additionally, the statistical outcomes of 3D morphological quantification agreed with our initial qualitative observations among different test groups. This novel quantification approach generates more spatially accurate and objective measures, representing an important step toward improving the reliability of morphological comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22224751      PMCID: PMC3381293          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  28 in total

1.  A rapid, quantitative method for assessing axonal extension on biomaterial platforms.

Authors:  Jared M Cregg; Sherri L Wiseman; Nicole M Pietrzak-Goetze; Martyn R Smith; David B Jaroch; Daniel C Clupper; Ryan J Gilbert
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Spiny versus stubby: 3D reconstruction of human myenteric (type I) neurons.

Authors:  Tobias M Lindig; Vinod Kumar; Ron Kikinis; Steve Pieper; Falk Schrödl; Winfried L Neuhuber; Axel Brehmer
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Tissue engineering and wound healing: an overview of the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Peter J van Winterswijk; Erik Nout
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.546

Review 4.  Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis as mechanisms of vascular network formation, growth and remodeling.

Authors:  S Patan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Quantitative assessment of angiogenesis and tumor vessel architecture by computer-assisted digital image analysis: effects of VEGF-toxin conjugate on tumor microvessel density.

Authors:  R Wild; S Ramakrishnan; J Sedgewick; A W Griffioen
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.514

6.  Multifractal and lacunarity analysis of microvascular morphology and remodeling.

Authors:  Daniel J Gould; Tegy J Vadakkan; Ross A Poché; Mary E Dickinson
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Three-dimensional culture for expansion and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Scott F Collins; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Computational geometry for patient-specific reconstruction and meshing of blood vessels from MR and CT angiography.

Authors:  Luca Antiga; Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Andrea Remuzzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A novel, microcarrier-based in vitro assay for rapid and reliable quantification of three-dimensional cell migration and angiogenesis.

Authors:  V Nehls; D Drenckhahn
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.

Authors:  S B Fox; R D Leek; M P Weekes; R M Whitehouse; K C Gatter; A L Harris
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.996

View more
  8 in total

1.  An In Vitro 3D Model and Computational Pipeline to Quantify the Vasculogenic Potential of iPSC-Derived Endothelial Progenitors.

Authors:  Cody O Crosby; Janet Zoldan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Quantification of Confocal Images Using LabVIEW for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Lauren Sfakis; Tim Kamaldinov; Melinda Larsen; James Castracane; Alexander Khmaladze
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  A Contact-Based Method for Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells into an Endothelial Cell-Phenotype.

Authors:  Binata Joddar; Shweta Anil Kumar; Alok Kumar
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.194

4.  Mechanisms of tubulogenesis and endothelial phenotype expression by MSCs.

Authors:  Julie A Rytlewski; M Alejandra Aldon; Evan W Lewis; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.514

5.  Fibrin-based 3D matrices induce angiogenic behavior of adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Eunna Chung; Julie A Rytlewski; Arjun G Merchant; Kabir S Dhada; Evan W Lewis; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Qiber3D-an open-source software package for the quantitative analysis of networks from 3D image stacks.

Authors:  Anna Jaeschke; Hagen Eckert; Laura J Bray
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Imaging challenges in biomaterials and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Alyssa A Appel; Mark A Anastasio; Jeffery C Larson; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Therapeutic assessment of mesenchymal stem cells delivered within a PEGylated fibrin gel following an ischemic injury.

Authors:  Laura M Ricles; Pei-Ling Hsieh; Nicholas Dana; Viktoriya Rybalko; Chelsea Kraynak; Roger P Farrar; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 12.479

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.