Literature DB >> 22223180

Rilonacept (interleukin-1 trap) in the prevention of acute gout flares during initiation of urate-lowering therapy: results of a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

H Ralph Schumacher1, John S Sundy, Robert Terkeltaub, Howard R Knapp, Scott J Mellis, Neil Stahl, George D Yancopoulos, Yuhwen Soo, Shirletta King-Davis, Steven P Weinstein, Allen R Radin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interleukin-1 inhibitor rilonacept (Interleukin-1 Trap) for prevention of gout flares occurring in the first few months following initiation of urate-lowering therapy.
METHODS: In this double-blind study, adult patients with hyperuricemia and gout were randomized to receive rilonacept administered subcutaneously once per week (loading dose 320 mg followed by 160 mg weekly) or placebo, and started on allopurinol (300 mg/day, titrated to serum urate <6 mg/dl). At study visits, physical and laboratory assessments were performed and information on any adverse events was ascertained.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the rilonacept and placebo groups (n = 41 and n = 42, respectively). The mean number of gout flares per patient through week 12 (primary efficacy end point) was markedly lower in the rilonacept group than in the placebo group (0.15 [6 flares] versus 0.79 [33 flares]; P = 0.0011). Fewer flares were observed with rilonacept as early as 4 weeks after initiation of treatment (P = 0.007). The proportion of patients experiencing a flare during the 12 weeks was lower in the rilonacept group than in the placebo group (14.6% versus 45.2%; P = 0.0037). No rebound in the flare rate was observed for 6 weeks after discontinuation of rilonacept or placebo at week 16. Adverse events were similar between groups, and no deaths or serious infectious adverse events were reported; the most common adverse events were infections (14.6% and 26.2% of rilonacept- and placebo-treated patients, respectively) and musculoskeletal disorders (14.6% and 21.4%, respectively). A higher percentage of rilonacept-treated patients (98%) compared with placebo-treated patients (79%) completed the primary 12-week evaluation period (P = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: The current findings indicate that rilonacept significantly reduces the frequency of gout flares during the initial period of treatment with urate-lowering therapy, with a favorable safety profile.
Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22223180     DOI: 10.1002/art.33412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  27 in total

1.  Pegloticase.

Authors:  Naomi Schlesinger; Uma Yasothan; Peter Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Anti-interleukin-1 therapy in the management of gout.

Authors:  Naomi Schlesinger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Evasion of inflammasome activation by microbial pathogens.

Authors:  Tyler K Ulland; Polly J Ferguson; Fayyaz S Sutterwala
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Uric acid as a danger signal in gout and its comorbidities.

Authors:  Kenneth L Rock; Hiroshi Kataoka; Jiann-Jyh Lai
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Interleukin-1 antagonism in acute gout: is targeting a single cytokine the answer?

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-10

Review 6.  [Full version of the S2e guidelines on gouty arthritis : Evidence-based guidelines of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh)].

Authors:  U Kiltz; R Alten; M Fleck; K Krüger; B Manger; U Müller-Ladner; H Nüßlein; M Reuss-Borst; A Schwarting; H Schulze-Koops; A Tausche; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Puja P Khanna; John D Fitzgerald; Manjit K Singh; Sangmee Bae; Tuhina Neogi; Michael H Pillinger; Joan Merill; Susan Lee; Shraddha Prakash; Marian Kaldas; Maneesh Gogia; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Will Taylor; Frédéric Lioté; Hyon Choi; Jasvinder A Singh; Nicola Dalbeth; Sanford Kaplan; Vandana Niyyar; Danielle Jones; Steven A Yarows; Blake Roessler; Gail Kerr; Charles King; Gerald Levy; Daniel E Furst; N Lawrence Edwards; Brian Mandell; H Ralph Schumacher; Mark Robbins; Neil Wenger; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  Optimizing current treatment of gout.

Authors:  Frances Rees; Michelle Hui; Michael Doherty
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 9.  Mechanistic aspects of inflammation and clinical management of inflammation in acute gouty arthritis.

Authors:  Bruce N Cronstein; Prashanth Sunkureddi
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.517

10.  Latest evidence on gout management: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  Christopher M Burns; Robert L Wortmann
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.