Literature DB >> 22222673

Impact on quality of life after ring pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse.

Tarinee Manchana1, Suvit Bunyavejchevin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and quality of life (QOL) improvement in patients who continue ring pessary use at 1 year.
METHODS: Seventy-seven symptomatic POP patients had successful fitting, and 64 patients (83.1%) continued use at 1 year. The Thai version of Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms associated with POP and impact on QOL. A higher score represents a greater impairment on the QOL, whereas a lower score represents a better QOL.
RESULTS: Mean age was 66.7 ± 8.6 years, median parity was 4 (range 0-10), 59 patients (92.2%) were menopausal, and none had received hormone treatment. Only nine patients (14.1%) were sexually active. Most patients were in the advanced stage of POP - 32.8% stage 3 and 29.7% stage 4. Improvement of prolapse symptoms and voiding difficulty were reported in 100% and 85.7% of the patients, respectively. Among patients who had lower urinary tract symptoms at pre-treatment, about half of patients improvement in frequency, urgency, and urgency urinary incontinence. Only 9.1% of the patients had improvement in stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and 23.8% of the patients reported new onset of SUI (de novo SUI). The median score from all P-QOL domains except personal relationships were significantly decreased after 1 year of ring pessary use. The median total scores at baseline and at 1 year were 40 and 8, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Ring pessary is an effective non-surgical treatment to alleviate symptoms associated with POP. It can improve QOL in symptomatic POP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222673     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1634-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  17 in total

1.  A survey of pessary use by members of the American urogynecologic society.

Authors:  G W Cundiff; A C Weidner; A G Visco; R C Bump; W A Addison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Ring pessary for all pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tarinee Manchana
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ruwan J Fernando; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan; Sheetle M Shah; Peter W Jones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Use of a pessary in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life, compliance, and failure at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Po-Chun Ko; Tsia-Shu Lo; Ling-Hong Tseng; Yi-Hao Lin; Ching-Chung Liang; Shu-Jane Lee
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Impact of pessary use on prolapse symptoms, quality of life, and body image.

Authors:  Minita Patel; Colleen Mellen; David M O'Sullivan; Christine A LaSala
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Survey of the characteristics and satisfaction degree of the patients using a pessary.

Authors:  Sang Wook Bai; Bo Sung Yoon; Ja Young Kwon; Jong Seung Shin; Sei Kwang Kim; Ki Hyun Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-12-01

8.  Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Clemons; Vivian C Aguilar; Tara A Tillinghast; Neil D Jackson; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Management of the urethral outlet in patients with severe prolapse.

Authors:  Lauri J Romanzi
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Important clinical outcomes in urogynecology: views of patients, nurses and medical staff.

Authors:  D G Tincello; Z Alfirevic
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002
View more
  10 in total

1.  Vaginal pessaries in the management of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in rural Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: a pre-post interventional study.

Authors:  Benjamin C Shayo; Gileard G Masenga; Vibeke Rasch
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

3.  Predictors for long-term adherence to vaginal pessary in pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study.

Authors:  Danielle I Niigaki; Rebecca S P Silva; Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini; Fátima F Fitz; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Pessary types and discontinuation rates in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Birte Wolff; Kathryn Williams; Allen Winkler; Lawrence Lind; Dara Shalom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Symptomatic and anatomic improvement of pelvic organ prolapse in vaginal pessary users.

Authors:  Lanuza Celes Mendes; Leonardo Robson Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra; Andreisa Paiva Monteiro Bilhar; José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto; Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos; Dayana Maia Saboia; Sara Arcanjo Lino Karbage
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Cross sectional study on assessment of ring pessary cleaning and removal every six months: adverse events and complications.

Authors:  Suelene Costa de Albuquerque Coelho; Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira; Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito; Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Manzini; Lisan M Morsinkhof; C Huub van der Vaart; Mariëlla I J Withagen; Anique T M Grob
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 1.932

8.  Vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a multiprofessional survey of practice.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Suzanne Hagen; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Stewart; Melanie Dembinsky; Pauline Sobiesuo; Rohna Kearney
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-18

10.  A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Brian Williams; Suzanne Hagen; Janet Logan; Cathryn Glazener; Stewart Pringle; Lesley Sinclair
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.