Literature DB >> 22222461

Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency.

Jamie Trott1, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Azim Surani, M Madan Babu, Alfonso Martinez-Arias.   

Abstract

Analysis of transcription at the level of single cells in prokaryotes and eukaryotes has revealed the existence of heterogeneities in the expression of individual genes within genetically homogeneous populations. This variation is an emerging hallmark of populations of Embryonic Stem (ES) cells and has been ascribed to the stochasticity associated with the biochemical events that mediate gene expression. It has been suggested that these heterogeneities play a role in the maintenance of pluripotency. However, for the most part, studies have focused on individual genes in large cell populations. Here we use an existing dataset on the expression of eight genes involved in pluripotency in eighty-three ES cells to create Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) at the single cell level. We observe widespread heterogeneities in the expression of the eight genes, but analysis of correlations within individual cells reveals three distinct classes centered on the expression of Nanog, a marker of pluripotency, and Fgf5, a gene associated with differentiation: high levels of Nanog and low levels of Fgf5, low levels of Nanog and high levels of Fgf5, and low levels of both. Each of these classes is associated with a collection of active sub-networks, with differing degrees of connectivity between their elements, which define a cellular state: self-renewal, primed for differentiation or transition between the two. Though every cell should be governed by the same network, the active sub-networks may emerge due to considerations such as variation in (i) the expression level of active transcription factors (e.g. through post-translational modification or ligand/co-factor availability) or (ii) access to the target gene locus (e.g. via changes in chromatin status or epigenetic modifications). We conclude that heterogeneities in gene expression should not be interpreted as representing different states of a single unique network, but as a reflection of the activity of different sub-networks in sub-populations of cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222461     DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05398a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  21 in total

1.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Adam Filipczyk; Carsten Marr; Simon Hastreiter; Justin Feigelman; Michael Schwarzfischer; Philipp S Hoppe; Dirk Loeffler; Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris; Max Endele; Bernhard Schauberger; Oliver Hilsenbeck; Stavroula Skylaki; Jan Hasenauer; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Fabian J Theis; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Stem cell modeling: From gene networks to cell populations.

Authors:  Jincheng Wu; Mahboubeh Rahmati Rostami; Emmanuel S Tzanakakis
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.163

3.  The gene regulatory network of mESC differentiation: a benchmark for reverse engineering methods.

Authors:  Johannes Meisig; Nils Blüthgen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes.

Authors:  Naomi Moris; Cristina Pina; Alfonso Martinez Arias
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Network Features and Dynamical Landscape of Naive and Primed Pluripotency.

Authors:  Benjamin Pfeuty; Clémence Kress; Bertrand Pain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Ethanol alters the balance of Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog expression in distinct subpopulations during differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Joshua W Ogony; Evangelia Malahias; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; Helen Anni
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 7.  Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture.

Authors:  Guilhem Chalancon; Charles N J Ravarani; S Balaji; Alfonso Martinez-Arias; L Aravind; Raja Jothi; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Contribution of stochastic partitioning at human embryonic stem cell division to NANOG heterogeneity.

Authors:  Jincheng Wu; Emmanuel S Tzanakakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Slow protein fluctuations explain the emergence of growth phenotypes and persistence in clonal bacterial populations.

Authors:  Andrea Rocco; Andrzej M Kierzek; Johnjoe McFadden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ben D MacArthur; Ana Sevilla; Michel Lenz; Franz-Josef Müller; Berhard M Schuldt; Andreas A Schuppert; Sonya J Ridden; Patrick S Stumpf; Miguel Fidalgo; Avi Ma'ayan; Jianlong Wang; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.