Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson1, Ilka Schellschmidt, Dan Apter. 1. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet/Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. kristina.gemzell@ki.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify an appropriate dose for a new contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, three-arm, phase II study. SETTING:Thirty-seven centers in five European countries. PATIENT(S): Parous or nulliparous women aged 21-40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment with LNG-IUSs with initial in vitro release rates of 12 or 16 μg/d (LNG-IUS12/16) or 20 μg/d (Mirena). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pearl index, bleeding profile, ease/pain of placement/removal, adverse events. RESULT(S): A total of 738 subjects had an LNG-IUS placed (LNG-IUS12, n = 239; LNG-IUS16, n = 245; Mirena, n = 254). One, 5, and 0 pregnancies occurred in the LNG-IUS12, LNG-IUS16, and Mirena groups, respectively (3-year unadjusted Pearl indices: 0.17, 0.82, and 0). The bleeding profiles were similar in all groups, although total bleeding and spotting days decreased with increasing LNG dose. During 3 years, 10 subjects in the LNG-IUS12 (2 women), LNG-IUS16 (3 women), and Mirena (5 women) groups reported serious adverse events, possibly related to study treatment. Placement of LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 was considered easy in 94% versus 86.2% in the Mirena group and 72.3% in the LNG-IUS12/LNG-IUS16 group reported either "no pain" or only "mild pain" during placement versus 57.9% in the Mirena group. CONCLUSION(S): LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 provided effective contraception, acceptable bleeding patterns, and were well tolerated compared with Mirena.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To identify an appropriate dose for a new contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, three-arm, phase II study. SETTING: Thirty-seven centers in five European countries. PATIENT(S): Parous or nulliparous women aged 21-40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment with LNG-IUSs with initial in vitro release rates of 12 or 16 μg/d (LNG-IUS12/16) or 20 μg/d (Mirena). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pearl index, bleeding profile, ease/pain of placement/removal, adverse events. RESULT(S): A total of 738 subjects had an LNG-IUS placed (LNG-IUS12, n = 239; LNG-IUS16, n = 245; Mirena, n = 254). One, 5, and 0 pregnancies occurred in the LNG-IUS12, LNG-IUS16, and Mirena groups, respectively (3-year unadjusted Pearl indices: 0.17, 0.82, and 0). The bleeding profiles were similar in all groups, although total bleeding and spotting days decreased with increasing LNG dose. During 3 years, 10 subjects in the LNG-IUS12 (2 women), LNG-IUS16 (3 women), and Mirena (5 women) groups reported serious adverse events, possibly related to study treatment. Placement of LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 was considered easy in 94% versus 86.2% in the Mirena group and 72.3% in the LNG-IUS12/LNG-IUS16 group reported either "no pain" or only "mild pain" during placement versus 57.9% in the Mirena group. CONCLUSION(S): LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 provided effective contraception, acceptable bleeding patterns, and were well tolerated compared with Mirena.
Authors: Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: David Hubacher; Courtney A Schreiber; David K Turok; Jeffrey T Jensen; Mitchell D Creinin; Kavita Nanda; Katharine O'Connell White; Ila Dayananda; Stephanie B Teal; Pai-Lien Chen; Beatrice A Chen; Alisa B Goldberg; Jennifer L Kerns; Clint Dart; Anita L Nelson; Michael A Thomas; David F Archer; Jill E Brown; Paula M Castaño; Anne E Burke; Bliss Kaneshiro; Diana L Blithe Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-07-16
Authors: Siripanth Nippita; Johana D Oviedo; Margarita G Velasco; Carolyn L Westhoff; Anne R Davis; Paula M Castaño Journal: Contraception Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Dan Apter; Brian Hauck; Thomas Schmelter; Sarah Rybowski; Kimberly Rosen; Anita Nelson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.240