Literature DB >> 22222193

A randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena.

Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson1, Ilka Schellschmidt, Dan Apter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify an appropriate dose for a new contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, three-arm, phase II study.
SETTING: Thirty-seven centers in five European countries. PATIENT(S): Parous or nulliparous women aged 21-40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment with LNG-IUSs with initial in vitro release rates of 12 or 16 μg/d (LNG-IUS12/16) or 20 μg/d (Mirena). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pearl index, bleeding profile, ease/pain of placement/removal, adverse events. RESULT(S): A total of 738 subjects had an LNG-IUS placed (LNG-IUS12, n = 239; LNG-IUS16, n = 245; Mirena, n = 254). One, 5, and 0 pregnancies occurred in the LNG-IUS12, LNG-IUS16, and Mirena groups, respectively (3-year unadjusted Pearl indices: 0.17, 0.82, and 0). The bleeding profiles were similar in all groups, although total bleeding and spotting days decreased with increasing LNG dose. During 3 years, 10 subjects in the LNG-IUS12 (2 women), LNG-IUS16 (3 women), and Mirena (5 women) groups reported serious adverse events, possibly related to study treatment. Placement of LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 was considered easy in 94% versus 86.2% in the Mirena group and 72.3% in the LNG-IUS12/LNG-IUS16 group reported either "no pain" or only "mild pain" during placement versus 57.9% in the Mirena group. CONCLUSION(S): LNG-IUS12 and LNG-IUS16 provided effective contraception, acceptable bleeding patterns, and were well tolerated compared with Mirena.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222193     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  25 in total

1.  Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

3.  Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; John Paul Farala; Berenice Jimenez; Moena Nishikawa; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Contraception technology: past, present and future.

Authors:  Regine Sitruk-Ware; Anita Nath; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Courtney A Schreiber; David K Turok; Jeffrey T Jensen; Mitchell D Creinin; Kavita Nanda; Katharine O'Connell White; Ila Dayananda; Stephanie B Teal; Pai-Lien Chen; Beatrice A Chen; Alisa B Goldberg; Jennifer L Kerns; Clint Dart; Anita L Nelson; Michael A Thomas; David F Archer; Jill E Brown; Paula M Castaño; Anne E Burke; Bliss Kaneshiro; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-16

6.  A randomized controlled trial of daily text messages versus monthly paper diaries to collect bleeding data after intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Siripanth Nippita; Johana D Oviedo; Margarita G Velasco; Carolyn L Westhoff; Anne R Davis; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  The Effect of Age, Parity and Body Mass Index on the Efficacy, Safety, Placement and User Satisfaction Associated With Two Low-Dose Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Contraceptive Systems: Subgroup Analyses of Data From a Phase III Trial.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Dan Apter; Brian Hauck; Thomas Schmelter; Sarah Rybowski; Kimberly Rosen; Anita Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in effective contraception.

Authors:  Abdelhamid M Attia; Magdy M Ibrahim; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  New and emerging contraceptives: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; M Valeria Bahamondes
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-19

Review 10.  Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States.

Authors:  Jennie Yoost
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.