Literature DB >> 22222169

Ureteral stents placed at the time of urinary diversion decreases postoperative morbidity.

Jeffrey K Mullins1, Thomas J Guzzo, Mark W Ball, Phillip M Pierorazio, John Eifler, Thomas W Jarrett, Mark P Schoenberg, Trinity J Bivalacqua.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of stenting ureteroenteric anastomoses on postoperative stricture rate and gastrointestinal recovery in continent and noncontinent urinary diversions (UDs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic data on 192 consecutive patients who underwent a radical cystectomy and UD. Patients received either a continent or noncontinent UD with or without stent placement through the ureteroenteric anastomoses. Stricture rate, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, and stricture characteristics were analyzed. Study endpoints were compared between four groups--stented and nonstented continent and stented and nonstented noncontinent UDs.
RESULTS: 36% of patients were stented and 64% were nonstented at the time of UD. Total ureteral stricture rate was 9.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in stricture rate (p = 0.11) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.081) in stented compared to nonstented patients. There was a significantly (p = 0.014) greater rate of ileus in patients who were nonstented in both continent and noncontinent UDs.
CONCLUSION: Stenting of ureteroenteric anastomoses in both continent and noncontinent UD has no effect on postoperative stricture rate, but is associated with lower rates of postoperative ileus.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222169      PMCID: PMC3304517          DOI: 10.1159/000335212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  14 in total

1.  Long-term results of antegrade endoureterotomy using the holmium laser in patients with ureterointestinal strictures.

Authors:  B A Laven; R C O'Connor; G D Steinberg; G S Gerber
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Stented versus nonstented ureteroileal anastomoses: is there a difference with regard to leak and stricture?

Authors:  J B Regan; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Stented versus nonstented transverse colon conduits: a comparative report.

Authors:  A M Beddoe; J G Boyce; J C Remy; R G Fruchter; J H Nelson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Evaluation of direct versus non-refluxing technique and functional results in orthotopic Y-ileal neobladder after 12 years of follow up.

Authors:  Ayman A Hassan; Samir A Elgamal; Magdy A Sabaa; Khalid A Salem; Mahmoud S Elmateet
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  Long-term results of endoureterotomy and open surgical revision for the management of ureteroenteric strictures after urinary diversion.

Authors:  Brett A Laven; R Corey O'Connor; Glenn S Gerber; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Agostino Mattei; Frederic D Birkhaeuser; Christian Baermann; Sebastian H Warncke; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Erik Kouba; Matt Sands; Aaron Lentz; Eric Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup.

Authors:  R E Hautmann; R de Petriconi; H W Gottfried; K Kleinschmidt; R Mattes; T Paiss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Primary endoscopic management versus open revision of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after urinary diversion--single institution contemporary series.

Authors:  Paul M Milhoua; Nicole L Miller; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; Joseph A Smith; S Duke Herrell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Uretero-intestinal anastomosis: Achilles heel of urinary diversion using bowel segments].

Authors:  K Weingärtner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Getting out of a tight spot: an overview of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Sophie Dupré; Arun Sahai; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Intraoperative Ureteral Stent Use at Radical Cystectomy is Associated with Higher 30-Day Complication Rates.

Authors:  Sherri M Donat; Kay See Tan; Ghalib Jibara; Guido Dalbagni; Vittoria Arslan Carlon; Jaspreet Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The Use of a Metal Stent in the Treatment of Ureteral Stricture in a Patient Who Had Undergone Radical Cystectomy with the Creation of an Ileal Conduit.

Authors:  Taku Mochizuki; Takashi Kawahara; Genta Iwamoto; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Yao; Hiroji Uemura
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 5.  Neobladder "Function": Tips and Tricks for Surgery and Postoperative Management.

Authors:  Daniela Fasanella; Michele Marchioni; Luigi Domanico; Claudia Franzini; Antonino Inferrera; Luigi Schips; Francesco Greco
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Predictors of Benign Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures After Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Katherine A Amin; Emily A Vertosick; Gillian Stearns; Ali Fathollahi; Daniel D Sjoberg; Machele S Donat; Harry Herr; Bernard Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.649

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.