Literature DB >> 22222146

The PRECISE RCT: evolution of an early septic shock fluid resuscitation trial.

Lauralyn McIntyre1, Dean A Fergusson, Brian Rowe, Deborah J Cook, Yaseen Arabi, Sean M Bagshaw, Marcel Emond, Simon Finfer, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Alasdair Gray, Robert Green, Paul Hebert, Eddy Lang, John Marshall, Ian Stiell, Alan Tinmouth, Joe Pagliarello, Alexis Turgeon, Timothy Walsh, Andrew Worster, Ryan Zarychanski.   

Abstract

Severe sepsis and septic shock are the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit; and the risk of death is substantial, estimated at approximately 40%. Evidence suggests that early resuscitation strategies that include the use of resuscitation fluids, antibiotics, blood, and inotropes reduce death. Although fluid resuscitation is an immediate life-saving intervention, a fundamental question that remains unanswered is whether the type of resuscitation fluid impacts survival when it is initiated very early in the course of septic shock. A randomized controlled trial published in 2008 confirmed that hydroxyethyl starch fluids cause acute renal failure defined by the requirement for renal replacement therapy. In contrast, a subgroup analysis from a randomized controlled trial suggests that 4% albumin fluid may reduce death from severe sepsis; however, these findings require confirmation in a large randomized trial. Our team is planning a pragmatic early septic shock fluid resuscitation trial that will compare the effectiveness of 5% albumin vs normal saline on 90-day mortality (PRECISE). In this article, we summarize the scientific rationale and inherent challenges associated with the conduct of PRECISE, the background work and planning elements that have been undertaken, and the PRECISE RCT protocol with rationale and justifications provided for the chosen population, the interventions, and the outcome measures.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222146     DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Rev        ISSN: 0887-7963


  5 in total

1.  Cardiovascular management of septic shock in 2012.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Vazquez Guillamet; Chanu Rhee; Andrew J Patterson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Liberal versus conservative fluid therapy in adults and children with sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  Danyang Li; Xueyang Li; Wei Cui; Huahao Shen; Hong Zhu; Yi Xia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-10

3.  Choice of Fluids in Severe Septic Patients - A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Informed by Recent Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Albert Farrugia; Megha Bansal; Sonia Balboni; Mary Clare Kimber; Gregory S Martin; Josephine Cassar
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2014

4.  A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Lehana Thabane; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Patricia Liaw; Karen Choong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Michael A Laffan; Umeer Waheed; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.