Literature DB >> 22222027

Measurement of focal ground-glass opacity diameters on CT images: interobserver agreement in regard to identifying increases in the size of ground-glass opacities.

Ryutaro Kakinuma1, Kazuto Ashizawa, Keiko Kuriyama, Aya Fukushima, Hiroyuki Ishikawa, Hisashi Kamiya, Naoya Koizumi, Yuichiro Maruyama, Kazunori Minami, Norihisa Nitta, Seitaro Oda, Yasuji Oshiro, Masahiko Kusumoto, Sadayuki Murayama, Kiyoshi Murata, Yukio Muramatsu, Noriyuki Moriyama.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate interobserver agreement in regard to measurements of focal ground-glass opacities (GGO) diameters on computed tomography (CT) images to identify increases in the size of GGOs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approval by the institutional review board and informed consent by the patients were obtained. Ten GGOs (mean size, 10.4 mm; range, 6.5-15 mm), one each in 10 patients (mean age, 65.9 years; range, 58-78 years), were used to make the diameter measurements. Eleven radiologists independently measured the diameters of the GGOs on a total of 40 thin-section CT images (the first [n = 10], the second [n = 10], and the third [n = 10] follow-up CT examinations and remeasurement of the first [n = 10] follow-up CT examinations) without comparing time-lapse CT images. Interobserver agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: The smallest range of the 95% limits of interobserver agreement between the members of the 55 pairs of the 11 radiologists in regard to maximal diameter was -1.14 to 1.72 mm, and the largest range was -7.7 to 1.7 mm. The mean value of the lower limit of the 95% limits of agreement was -3.1 ± 1.4 mm, and the mean value of their upper limit was 2.5 ± 1.1 mm.
CONCLUSION: When measurements are made by any two radiologists, an increase in the length of the maximal diameter of more than 1.72 mm would be necessary in order to be able to state that the maximal diameter of a particular GGO had actually increased. Copyright Â
© 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222027     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  17 in total

1.  Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules with solid portions of 5 mm or smaller: Their natural course and predictors of interval growth.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Chang Min Park; Sang Min Lee; Hyungjin Kim; H Page McAdams; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Management of ground-glass opacities: should all pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity be surgically resected?

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kobayashi; Tetsuya Mitsudomi
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10

3.  Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: How long should they be observed until clinically relevant growth occurs?

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: model-based iterative reconstruction for nodule classification and measurement variability on low-dose CT.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Seong Ho Kim; Sang Min Lee; Sang Joon Park; Kyung Hee Lee; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Software performance in segmenting ground-glass and solid components of subsolid nodules in pulmonary adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Julien G Cohen; Jin Mo Goo; Roh-Eul Yoo; Chang Min Park; Chang Hyun Lee; Bram van Ginneken; Doo Hyun Chung; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules: is measuring solid component size a better prognostic indicator?

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Chang Min Park; Youngjin Ryu; Sang Min Lee; Young Tae Kim; Young Whan Kim; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Persistent part-solid nodules with solid part of 5 mm or smaller: Can the 'follow-up and surgical resection after interval growth' policy have a negative effect on patient prognosis?

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Chang Min Park; Hyungjin Kim; Eui Jin Hwang; Juil Park; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Emphysema progression is visually detectable in low-dose CT in continuous but not in former smokers.

Authors:  Mathilde Marie Winkler Wille; Laura H Thomsen; Asger Dirksen; Jens Petersen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Saher B Shaker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Pulmonary adenocarcinomas presenting as ground-glass opacities on multidetector CT: three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of growth pattern and doubling time.

Authors:  Andrea Borghesi; Davide Farina; Silvia Michelini; Matteo Ferrari; Diego Benetti; Simona Fisogni; Andrea Tironi; Roberto Maroldi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.