BACKGROUND: End-of-life care research across Africa is under-resourced and under-developed. A central issue in research in end-of-life care is the measurement of effects and outcomes of care on patients and families. Little is known about the experiences of health professionals' selection and implementation of outcome measures (OM) in clinical care, research, audit, or teaching in Africa. METHODS: An online survey was undertaken of those using outcome measures across the region, as part of the PRISMA project. A questionnaire addressing the use of OMs was developed for a similar survey in Europe and adapted for Africa. Participants were sampled through the contacts database of APCA. Invitation emails were sent out in January 2010 and reminders in February 2010. RESULTS: 168/301 invited contacts (56%) from 24 countries responded, with 78 respondents having previously used OM (65% in clinical practice, 12% in research and 23% for both). Main reasons for not using OM were a lack of guidance/training on using and analysing OM, with 49% saying that they would use the tools if this was provided. 40% of those using OM in clinical practice used POS, and 80% used them to assess, evaluate and monitor change. The POS was also the main tool used in research, with the principle criteria for use being validation in Africa, access to the tool and time needed to complete it. Challenges to the use of tools were shortage of time and resources, lack of guidance and training for the professionals, poor health status of patients and complexity of OM. Researchers also have problems analysing OM data. The APCA African POS was the most common version of the POS used, and was reported as a valuable tool for measuring outcomes. Respondents indicated the ideal outcome tool should be short, multi-dimensional and easy to use. CONCLUSION: This was the first survey on professionals' views on OM in Africa. It showed that the APCA African POS was the most frequently OM used. Training and support are needed to help professionals utilise OM in palliative care, and OMs have an ongoing and important role in palliative care in Africa.
BACKGROUND: End-of-life care research across Africa is under-resourced and under-developed. A central issue in research in end-of-life care is the measurement of effects and outcomes of care on patients and families. Little is known about the experiences of health professionals' selection and implementation of outcome measures (OM) in clinical care, research, audit, or teaching in Africa. METHODS: An online survey was undertaken of those using outcome measures across the region, as part of the PRISMA project. A questionnaire addressing the use of OMs was developed for a similar survey in Europe and adapted for Africa. Participants were sampled through the contacts database of APCA. Invitation emails were sent out in January 2010 and reminders in February 2010. RESULTS: 168/301 invited contacts (56%) from 24 countries responded, with 78 respondents having previously used OM (65% in clinical practice, 12% in research and 23% for both). Main reasons for not using OM were a lack of guidance/training on using and analysing OM, with 49% saying that they would use the tools if this was provided. 40% of those using OM in clinical practice used POS, and 80% used them to assess, evaluate and monitor change. The POS was also the main tool used in research, with the principle criteria for use being validation in Africa, access to the tool and time needed to complete it. Challenges to the use of tools were shortage of time and resources, lack of guidance and training for the professionals, poor health status of patients and complexity of OM. Researchers also have problems analysing OM data. The APCA African POS was the most common version of the POS used, and was reported as a valuable tool for measuring outcomes. Respondents indicated the ideal outcome tool should be short, multi-dimensional and easy to use. CONCLUSION: This was the first survey on professionals' views on OM in Africa. It showed that the APCA African POS was the most frequently OM used. Training and support are needed to help professionals utilise OM in palliative care, and OMs have an ongoing and important role in palliative care in Africa.
Authors: Richard A Powell; Julia Downing; Richard Harding; Faith Mwangi-Powell; Stephen Connor Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Gwenda Albers; Michael A Echteld; Henrica C W de Vet; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Mecheline H M van der Linden; Luc Deliens Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Marie Bakitas; Mark T Hegel; Brett Hanscom; Jay Hull; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Richard Harding; Richard A Powell; Eve Namisango; Anne Merriman; Nancy Gikaara; Zipporah Ali; Irene J Higginson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Eve Namisango; Chris Ntege; Emmanuel B K Luyirika; Fatia Kiyange; Matthew J Allsop Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: M Jane Bates; Treza Mphwatiwa; Jane Ardrey; Nicola Desmond; Louis W Niessen; S Bertel Squire Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kenneth Mah; Richard A Powell; Carmine Malfitano; Nancy Gikaara; Lesley Chalklin; Sarah Hales; Anne Rydall; Camilla Zimmermann; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Gary Rodin Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2019-06
Authors: David Blum; Lucy E Selman; Godfrey Agupio; Thandi Mashao; Keletso Mmoledi; Tony Moll; Natalya Dinat; Liz Gwyther; Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira; Barbara Ikin; Julia Downing; Stein Kaasa; Irene J Higginson; Richard Harding Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Jeffrey V Lazarus; Kelly Safreed-Harmon; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Jane Anderson; Ricardo Baptista Leite; Georg Behrens; Linda-Gail Bekker; Sanjay Bhagani; Darren Brown; Graham Brown; Susan Buchbinder; Carlos Caceres; Pedro E Cahn; Patrizia Carrieri; Georgina Caswell; Graham S Cooke; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Nikos Dedes; Julia Del Amo; Richard Elliott; Wafaa M El-Sadr; María José Fuster-Ruiz de Apodaca; Giovanni Guaraldi; Tim Hallett; Richard Harding; Margaret Hellard; Shabbar Jaffar; Meaghan Kall; Marina Klein; Sharon R Lewin; Ken Mayer; Jose A Pérez-Molina; Doreen Moraa; Denise Naniche; Denis Nash; Teymur Noori; Anton Pozniak; Reena Rajasuriar; Peter Reiss; Nesrine Rizk; Jürgen Rockstroh; Diana Romero; Caroline Sabin; David Serwadda; Laura Waters Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 14.919