Literature DB >> 22221842

Safety and efficiency of a chest pain diagnostic algorithm with selective outpatient stress testing for emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.

Frank Xavier Scheuermeyer1, Grant Innes, Eric Grafstein, Marla Kiess, Barb Boychuk, Eugenia Yu, Daniel Kalla, Jim Christenson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Chest pain units have been used to monitor and investigate emergency department (ED) patients with potential ischemic chest pain to reduce the possibility of missed acute coronary syndrome. We seek to optimize the use of hospital resources by implementing a chest pain diagnostic algorithm.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients with potential ischemic chest pain. High-risk patients were referred to cardiology, and patients without ECG or biomarker evidence of ischemia were discharged home after 2 to 6 hours of observation. Emergency physicians scheduled discharged patients for outpatient stress ECGs or radionuclide scans at the hospital within 48 hours. Patients with positive provocative test results were immediately referred back to the ED. The primary outcome was the rate of missed diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome at 30 days.
RESULTS: We prospectively followed 1,116 consecutive patients who went through the chest pain diagnostic algorithm, of whom 197 (17.7%) were admitted at the index visit and 254 (22.8%) received outpatient testing on discharge. The 30-day acute coronary syndrome event rate was 10.8%, and the 30-day missed acute coronary syndrome rate was 0% (95% confidence interval 0% to 2.4%). Of the 120 acute coronary syndrome cases, 99 (82.5%) were diagnosed at the index ED visit, and 21 patients (17.5%) received the diagnosis during outpatient stress testing.
CONCLUSION: In ED patients with chest pain, a structured diagnostic approach with time-focused ED decision points, brief observation, and selective application of early outpatient provocative testing appears both safe and diagnostically efficient, even though some patients with acute coronary syndrome may be discharged for outpatient stress testing on the index ED visit.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221842     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  Acute chest pain evaluation: is there too much stress on the system?

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; J Douglas Kirk
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  CT angiography for emergency decision making in acute coronary syndromes: applying future vision now.

Authors:  Paul Anaya; David J Moliterno
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another?

Authors:  Gianfranco Cervellin; Camilla Mattiuzzi; Chiara Bovo; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

4.  Symptom clusters in patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome differ by sex, age, and discharge diagnosis.

Authors:  Anne G Rosenfeld; Elizabeth P Knight; Alana Steffen; Larisa Burke; Mohamud Daya; Holli A DeVon
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  The Value of Continuous ST-Segment Monitoring in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Leonie Rose Bovino; Marjorie Funk; Michele M Pelter; Mayur M Desai; Vanessa Jefferson; Laura Kierol Andrews; Kenneth Forte
Journal:  Adv Emerg Nurs J       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  A combined care model using early access to specialists off-hours to reduce cardiac admissions.

Authors:  Michael Gavin; Bruce Landon; Jonathan Lu; Leila Ganjehei; Kalon Ho; Larry Nathanson; Edward Ullman; Shamai Grossman; Peter Zimetbaum
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?

Authors:  Henderson D McGinnis; Nicklaus P Ashburn; Brennan E Paradee; James C O'Neill; Anna C Snavely; Jason P Stopyra; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Disparities in cardiovascular outcomes among emergency department patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Shilpa Kumar; Herbert C Duber; William Kreuter; Amber K Sabbatini
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.093

9.  Diagnostic values of chest pain history, ECG, troponin and clinical gestalt in patients with chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome assessed in the emergency department.

Authors:  Arash Mokhtari; Eric Dryver; Martin Söderholm; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 10.  Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Omar Hasan; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.