Literature DB >> 22221634

Growth in the use of PET for six cancer types after coverage by medicare: additive or replacement?

Bruce E Hillner1, Anna N Tosteson, Yunjie Song, Tor D Tosteson, Tracy Onega, David C Goodman, Barry A Siegel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In July 2001, PET became a covered service for Medicare beneficiaries when used for the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of non-small-cell lung, esophageal, colorectal, and head and neck cancers as well as lymphoma and melanoma. Whether physicians use PET as a replacement for or in addition to CT, MRI, or bone scintigraphy (BS) is uncertain.
METHODS: A 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged > 64 years from 2004 through 2008 was used. Annually for each cancer type, a cohort of patients was created defined as having at least one admission with a primary cancer diagnosis or two nonhospital claims with a cancer diagnosis ≥7 days apart per calendar year. Each year, imaging claims and claim-days were counted by modality and cancer type. The sequence of PET use was examined as before, after, or instead of other imaging.
RESULTS: About 125,000 beneficiaries (2.5% of the cohort) met the cancer definition each year. In 2008, the combined annual imaging days per person-year were 2.3 for CT, 0.49 for MRI, 0.70 for PET, and 0.13 for BS. The annual rates of imaging from 2004 to 2008 increased by 0.5% for CT, 3.2% for MRI, and 18.0% for PET (range, 14.6%-19.9% by cancer type) and decreased by 12.7% for BS. The growth in PET use was not associated with meaningful changes in body CT. In 2007 and 2008, body CT preceded PET within 30 days in about half of patients, whereas PET preceded CT in only 22%.
CONCLUSIONS: Several years after its introduction, PET continued to grow rapidly, with evidence that it is replacing BS. Growth of PET occurred without evidence of a decline in body CT. About half of PET use occurred shortly after body CT, suggesting an additive or final arbiter role.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221634      PMCID: PMC3257824          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  39 in total

1.  Recent shifts in place of service for noninvasive diagnostic imaging: have hospitals missed an opportunity?

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Efficacy comparison between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy in detecting bony metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jin Woo Song; Yeon-Mock Oh; Tae-Sun Shim; Woo Sung Kim; Jin-Sook Ryu; Chang-Min Choi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Daisuke Takenaka; Yoshiharu Ohno; Keiko Matsumoto; Nobukazu Aoyama; Yumiko Onishi; Hisanobu Koyama; Munenobu Nogami; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Sumiaki Matsumoto; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Ulrik Lassen; Jann Mortensen; Søren Larsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bertelsen; Jesper Ravn; Paul Clementsen; Asbjørn Høgholm; Klaus Larsen; Torben Rasmussen; Susanne Keiding; Asger Dirksen; Oke Gerke; Birgit Skov; Ida Steffensen; Hanne Hansen; Peter Vilmann; Grete Jacobsen; Vibeke Backer; Niels Maltbaek; Jesper Pedersen; Henrik Madsen; Henrik Nielsen; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Andrew M Scott; Dishan H Gunawardana; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Jayne E Ramshaw; Peter Lin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Positron emission tomography in staging early lung cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna E Maziak; Gail E Darling; Richard I Inculet; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Albert A Driedger; Yee C Ung; John D Miller; Chu-Shu Gu; Kathryn J Cline; William K Evans; Mark N Levine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Therese M Mulvey; Robert M Langdon; Diane Blum; Peter A Ubel; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  NCCN task force: clinical utility of PET in a variety of tumor types.

Authors:  Donald A Podoloff; Douglas W Ball; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Steven J Cohen; R Edward Coleman; Dominique Delbeke; Maria Ho; David H Ilson; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Richard J Lee; Jay S Loeffler; Homer A Macapinlac; Robert J Morgan; Barry Alan Siegel; Seema Singhal; Douglas S Tyler; Richard J Wong
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.908

View more
  14 in total

1.  Does value mean quality? The payer's perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Imaging modality utilization trends in patients with stage III-IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yukako Ichimiya; Krishna Alluri; Charles Marcus; Simon Best; Christine H Chung; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  The emerging role of FDG PET/CT in rectal cancer management: is it time to use the technique for early prognostication?

Authors:  Luca Tagliabue
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Survival Impact of Increasing Time to Treatment Initiation for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Colin T Murphy; Thomas J Galloway; Elizabeth A Handorf; Brian L Egleston; Lora S Wang; Ranee Mehra; Douglas B Flieder; John A Ridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Positron emission tomography and stage migration in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Noam A VanderWalde; Ramzi G Salloum; Tsai-Ling Liu; Mark C Hornbrook; Maureen C O'Keeffe Rosetti; Debra P Ritzwoller; Paul A Fishman; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Amir H Khandani; Bhishamjit S Chera
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Geographic access to breast imaging for US women.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Rebecca Hubbard; Deirdre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Jennifer S Haas; Heather A Carlos; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Andy Bogart; Wendy B DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Beth A Virnig; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Facility-level analysis of PET scanning for staging among US veterans with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Todd H Wagner; Ellen M Schultz; Xiangyan Xu; Sharfun J Ghaus; Dawn Provenzale; David H Au
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Intended versus inferred care after PET performed for initial staging in the National Oncologic PET Registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Anna N Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Yunjie Song; Lucy G Hanna; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Geographic and sociodemographic disparities in PET use by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Bruce E Hillner; Yunjie Song; Barry A Siegel; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Treatment and Monitoring Variability in US Metastatic Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Jennifer L Caswell-Jin; Alison Callahan; Natasha Purington; Summer S Han; Haruka Itakura; Esther M John; Douglas W Blayney; George W Sledge; Nigam H Shah; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.