Literature DB >> 22221452

Moving from continuous dopaminergic stimulation to continuous drug delivery in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

O Gershanik1, P Jenner.   

Abstract

Motor fluctuations and motor complications are a major consequence of the treatment and progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) and they have, in particular, been linked to L-dopa therapy. Using continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) by employing longer acting dopaminergic drugs has been proposed as a means of avoiding or lowering their occurrence. However, both the preclinical and clinical evidence base suggest that this concept does not fully explain the differences between L-dopa and dopamine (DA) agonist drugs and that their pharmacological profiles may also be important. In addition, the way in which drugs are delivered in PD appears to have a marked influence on both efficacy and side-effect profile. As a consequence, the concept of continuous drug delivery (CDD) has arisen to explain the differences between the intermittent and continuous delivery of both L-dopa and DA agonists. This review presents the evidence for using CDD as a working concept for the early and later stages of PD and in the treatment of motor complications and motor fluctuations. CDD as an approach to the treatment of PD may improve the outcome of therapy and explain the differences between drug classes and the delivery systems employed.
© 2012 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2012 EFNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221452     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  9 in total

Review 1.  Early versus delayed initiation of pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Matthias Löhle; Carl-Johan Ramberg; Heinz Reichmann; Anthony H V Schapira
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  An update on the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Philippe Rizek; Niraj Kumar; Mandar S Jog
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Reciprocal cross-sensitization of D1 and D3 receptors following pharmacological stimulation in the hemiparkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Kathryn Lanza; Katherine Chemakin; Sarah Lefkowitz; Carolyn Saito; Nicole Chambers; Christopher Bishop
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Continuous drug delivery in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Marina Senek; Dag Nyholm
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Levodopa/benserazide microsphere (LBM) prevents L-dopa induced dyskinesia by inactivation of the DR1/PKA/P-tau pathway in 6-OHDA-lesioned Parkinson's rats.

Authors:  Cheng-long Xie; Wen-Wen Wang; Su-fang Zhang; Ming-Lu Yuan; Jun-Yi Che; Jing Gan; Lu Song; Wei-En Yuan; Zhen-Guo Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intracerebroventricular dopamine for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  David Devos; Jean-Christophe Devedjian; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Carbidopa-Levodopa Enteral Suspension and Deep Brain Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease-Related Pill Burden Reduction in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael J Soileau; Fernando Pagan; Alfonso Fasano; Ramon Rodriguez-Cruz; Lin Wang; Prasanna L Kandukuri; Connie H Yan; Ali Alobaidi; Yanjun Bao; Pavnit Kukreja; Mok Oh; Mustafa S Siddiqui
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 8.  Therapeutic Devices for Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: Current Progress and a Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Joji Fujikawa; Ryoma Morigaki; Nobuaki Yamamoto; Teruo Oda; Hiroshi Nakanishi; Yuishin Izumi; Yasushi Takagi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 9.  Revisiting the Medical Management of Parkinson's Disease: Levodopa versus Dopamine Agonist.

Authors:  Jinglin Zhang; Louis Chew-Seng Tan
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 7.363

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.