Literature DB >> 22221259

Periosteal-derived cells for bone bioengineering: a promising candidate.

Igor Iuco Castro-Silva1, Willian Fernando Zambuzzi, Letícia de Oliveira Castro, José Mauro Granjeiro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Over the last years so many efforts have been made in order to indentify natural sources of osteogenic cells for the success of bone bioengineering. Among them, periosteum tissue has emerged as an interesting candidate. Thus, we decided to evaluate the osteogenic potential of periosteal-derived cells by describing a sequence of biological events since initial morphological changes to mineralization of extracellular matrix (ECM).
METHODS: Periosteal-derived cells were obtained from calvarial of adult rats. After the primary culture and expansion, the adherent cells were cultured at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days under a classical osteogenic culture medium in order to evaluate the differentiation of those cells in mature osteoblast. It was monitored by evaluating a time-line of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (biomarker of osteoblast differentiation) and afterwards nodules of mineralization (measured by von Kossa staining and calcium content).
RESULTS: Analysis from phase-contrast microscopy revealed mainly morphological changes ranging since fibroblast-shaped (7 days, semi-confluent culture at exponential growth) to polyhedral-shaped cells (14-28 days, confluent culture during differentiation process). ALP activity was linearly increased since 14-28 days while amount of protein remained unchanged. Interesting, our data from von Kossa staining reveled a highest incidence of mineralization nodules at 28 days.
CONCLUSION: Taken our results together, we can suggest that periosteal-derived cells present an interesting potential to differentiate in mature osteoblast able to promote mineralization in vitro by incorporating to ECM circulating calcium from extracellular compartment. From our point of view, this source of osteogenic cells can be explored by bioengineers in order to advance therapeutic protocols able to solve bone degenerative lesions.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22221259     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Biofabrication and Bone Tissue Regeneration: Cell Source, Approaches, and Challenges.

Authors:  Monia Orciani; Milena Fini; Roberto Di Primio; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-23

3.  Prx1-Expressing Progenitor Primary Cilia Mediate Bone Formation in response to Mechanical Loading in Mice.

Authors:  Emily R Moore; Julia C Chen; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  Immunohistochemical and molecular characterization of the human periosteum.

Authors:  Sönke Percy Frey; Hendrik Jansen; Stefanie Doht; Luis Filgueira; Rene Zellweger
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-05-02

5.  Periosteal progenitors contribute to load-induced bone formation in adult mice and require primary cilia to sense mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Emily R Moore; Ya Xing Zhu; Han Seul Ryu; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 6.832

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.