Literature DB >> 22221232

Effect of low light and high noise on behavioural activity, physiological indicators of stress and production in laying hens.

E A O'connor1, M O Parker, E L Davey, H Grist, R C Owen, B Szladovits, T G M Demmers, C M Wathes, S M Abeyesinghe.   

Abstract

1. Commercial laying hens are commonly housed in noisy and dim environments, yet relatively little is known about whether these conditions, particularly in combination, have any effect on welfare or egg production. 2. The study was designed to investigate whether chronic exposure to continuous noise (60 dB(A) vs. 80 dB(A)) and/or light intensity (150 lux vs. 5 lux) during the critical period of coming into lay (16-24 weeks of age) influenced behaviour (activity, resting and feather maintenance), physiological stress (plasma corticosterone and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio) and production (number and weight of eggs laid) in laying hens. 3. Hens in the low light pens were less active and preened and dust-bathed more than those housed in 150 lux; hens in the high noise pens rested more frequently than those in quieter pens. 4. There was no evidence that chronic exposure to low light or high noise caused appreciable physiological stress but egg production was affected by these conditions. Hens kept in pens with low light or high noise laid fewer eggs per day than those kept in high light or low noise pens. These effects were additive, so that the fewest eggs were laid by hens subject to both low light and high noise. 5. These results show that low light intensity and continual high background noise have a detrimental effect on egg production in the early laying phase as well as influencing the time allocated to different behaviours. However there was no strong evidence for a physiological stress response to either of these conditions or their combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22221232     DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2011.639342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

1.  Increased mortality in a colony of zebra finches exposed to continuous light.

Authors:  Jessica M Snyder; Denise M Molk; Piper M Treuting
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Effect of light intensity and stocking density on the performance, egg quality, and feather condition of laying hens reared in a battery cage system over the first laying period.

Authors:  Kadir Erensoy; Musa Sarıca; Moise Noubandiguim; Mete Dur; Resul Aslan
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Behavioral responses of turkeys subjected to different climatic conditions.

Authors:  Angélica Signor Mendes; Daniella Jorge de Moura; Isadora Bischoff Nunes; Isabela Lopes Dos Santos; Cleverson de Souza; Gabriela Munhoz Morello; Sabrina Endo Takahashi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Effects of Dark Brooders on Behavior and Fearfulness in Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Diego A Guzman
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of blue-green LED lights with two perceived illuminance (human and poultry) on immune performance and skeletal development of layer chickens.

Authors:  Yongxiang Wei; Weichao Zheng; Qin Tong; Zonggang Li; Baoming Li; Haipeng Shi; Yuxin Wang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  Sophisticated Fowl: The Complex Behaviour and Cognitive Skills of Chickens and Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Laura Garnham; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-17

7.  The Human-Animal Relationship in Australian Caged Laying Hens.

Authors:  Lauren E Edwards; Grahame J Coleman; Kym L Butler; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The Effect of Light Intensity, Strain, and Age on the Behavior, Jumping Frequency and Success, and Welfare of Egg-Strain Pullets Reared in Perchery Systems.

Authors:  Jo Ann Chew; Tina Widowski; Eugenia Herwig; Tory Shynkaruk; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  The Effect of Music on Livestock: Cattle, Poultry and Pigs.

Authors:  Patrycja Ciborowska; Monika Michalczuk; Damian Bień
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.