Literature DB >> 22220875

Accessory costs of seed production and the evolution of angiosperms.

Janice M Lord1, Mark Westoby.   

Abstract

Accessory costs of reproduction frequently equal or exceed direct investment in offspring, and can limit the evolution of small offspring sizes. Early angiosperms had minimum seed sizes, an order of magnitude smaller than their contemporaries. It has been proposed that changes to reproductive features at the base of the angiosperm clade reduced accessory costs thus removing the fitness disadvantage of small seeds. We measured accessory costs of reproduction in 25 extant gymnosperms and angiosperms, to test whether angiosperms can produce small seeds more economically than gymnosperms. Total accessory costs scaled isometrically to seed mass for angiosperms but less than isometrically for gymnosperms, so that smaller seeds were proportionally more expensive for gymnosperms to produce. In particular, costs of abortions and packaging structures were significantly higher in gymnosperms. Also, the relationship between seed:ovule ratio and seed size was negative in angiosperms but positive in gymnosperms. We argue that the carpel was a key evolutionary innovation reducing accessory costs in angiosperms by allowing sporophytic control of pre- and postzygotic mate selection and timing of resource allocation. The resulting reduction in costs of aborting unfertilized ovules or genetically inferior embryos would have lowered total reproductive costs enabling early angiosperms to evolve small seed sizes and short generation times.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution © 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01425.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  The global spectrum of plant form and function.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Jens Kattge; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Ian J Wright; Sandra Lavorel; Stéphane Dray; Björn Reu; Michael Kleyer; Christian Wirth; I Colin Prentice; Eric Garnier; Gerhard Bönisch; Mark Westoby; Hendrik Poorter; Peter B Reich; Angela T Moles; John Dickie; Andrew N Gillison; Amy E Zanne; Jérôme Chave; S Joseph Wright; Serge N Sheremet'ev; Hervé Jactel; Christopher Baraloto; Bruno Cerabolini; Simon Pierce; Bill Shipley; Donald Kirkup; Fernando Casanoves; Julia S Joswig; Angela Günther; Valeria Falczuk; Nadja Rüger; Miguel D Mahecha; Lucas D Gorné
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Genetic Interaction of SEEDSTICK, GORDITA and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 during Seed Development.

Authors:  Dario Paolo; Gregorio Orozco-Arroyo; Lisa Rotasperti; Simona Masiero; Lucia Colombo; Stefan de Folter; Barbara A Ambrose; Elisabetta Caporali; Ignacio Ezquer; Chiara Mizzotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery.

Authors:  Tong Qiu; Robert Andrus; Marie-Claire Aravena; Davide Ascoli; Yves Bergeron; Roberta Berretti; Daniel Berveiller; Michal Bogdziewicz; Thomas Boivin; Raul Bonal; Don C Bragg; Thomas Caignard; Rafael Calama; J Julio Camarero; Chia-Hao Chang-Yang; Natalie L Cleavitt; Benoit Courbaud; Francois Courbet; Thomas Curt; Adrian J Das; Evangelia Daskalakou; Hendrik Davi; Nicolas Delpierre; Sylvain Delzon; Michael Dietze; Sergio Donoso Calderon; Laurent Dormont; Josep Espelta; Timothy J Fahey; William Farfan-Rios; Catherine A Gehring; Gregory S Gilbert; Georg Gratzer; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Andrew Hacket-Pain; Arndt Hampe; Qingmin Han; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Ines Ibanez; Jill F Johnstone; Valentin Journé; Daisuke Kabeya; Christopher L Kilner; Thomas Kitzberger; Johannes M H Knops; Richard K Kobe; Georges Kunstler; Jonathan G A Lageard; Jalene M LaMontagne; Mateusz Ledwon; Francois Lefevre; Theodor Leininger; Jean-Marc Limousin; James A Lutz; Diana Macias; Eliot J B McIntire; Christopher M Moore; Emily Moran; Renzo Motta; Jonathan A Myers; Thomas A Nagel; Kyotaro Noguchi; Jean-Marc Ourcival; Robert Parmenter; Ian S Pearse; Ignacio M Perez-Ramos; Lukasz Piechnik; John Poulsen; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez; Javier D Sanguinetti; C Lane Scher; William H Schlesinger; Harald Schmidt Van Marle; Barbara Seget; Shubhi Sharma; Miles Silman; Michael A Steele; Nathan L Stephenson; Jacob N Straub; I-Fang Sun; Samantha Sutton; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Peter A Thomas; Maria Uriarte; Giorgio Vacchiano; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; Boyd Wright; S Joseph Wright; Kai Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman; Roman Zlotin; Magdalena Zywiec; James S Clark
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Shoot and Root Traits Contribute to Drought Resistance in Recombinant Inbred Lines of MD 23-24 × SEA 5 of Common Bean.

Authors:  Jose Polania; Idupulapati M Rao; Cesar Cajiao; Miguel Grajales; Mariela Rivera; Federico Velasquez; Bodo Raatz; Stephen E Beebe
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  The Patterns of Male and Female Flowers in Flowering Stage May Not Be Optimal Resource Allocation for Fruit and Seed Growth.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Guozhu Yu; Fangyu Hu; Zhiqi Li; Weihua Li; Changlian Peng
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20

6.  Twelve fundamental life histories evolving through allocation-dependent fecundity and survival.

Authors:  Jacob Johansson; Åke Brännström; Johan A J Metz; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.