Literature DB >> 22220636

Risk stratification in cardiovascular disease primary prevention - scoring systems, novel markers, and imaging techniques.

Faiez Zannad1, Guy De Backer, Ian Graham, Matthias Lorenz, Giuseppe Mancia, David A Morrow, Zeljko Reiner, Wolfgang Koenig, Jean Dallongeville, Robert J Macfadyen, Luis M Ruilope, Lars Wilhelmsen.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review and discuss current methods of risk stratification for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, emerging biomarkers, and imaging techniques, and their relative merits and limitations. This report is based on discussions that took place among experts in the area during a special CardioVascular Clinical Trialists workshop organized by the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy in September 2009. Classical risk factors such as blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels remain the cornerstone of risk estimation in primary prevention but their use as a guide to management is limited by several factors: (i) thresholds for drug treatment vary with the available evidence for cost-effectiveness and benefit-to-risk ratios; (ii) assessment may be imprecise; (iii) residual risk may remain, even with effective control of dyslipidemia and hypertension. Novel measures include C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) , genetic markers, and markers of subclinical organ damage, for which there are varying levels of evidence. High-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to assess carotid atherosclerotic lesions have potential but require further validation, standardization, and proof of clinical usefulness in the general population. In conclusion, classical risk scoring systems are available and inexpensive but have a number of limitations. Novel risk markers and imaging techniques may have a place in drug development and clinical trial design. However, their additional value above and beyond classical risk factors has yet to be determined for risk-guided therapy in CVD prevention.
© 2012 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22220636     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2011.01023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0767-3981            Impact factor:   2.748


  10 in total

Review 1.  Statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Željko Reiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Statins for primary prevention: problems with cardiovascular-risk estimation?

Authors:  Željko Reiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with statins in the elderly.

Authors:  Zeljko Reiner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Utility of both carotid intima-media thickness and endothelial function for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with angina-like symptoms.

Authors:  Yasushi Matsuzawa; Sara Svedlund; Tatsuo Aoki; Raviteja R Guddeti; Taek-Geun Kwon; Rebecca Cilluffo; R Jay Widmer; Rebecca E Nelson; Ryan J Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Sinsia Gao; Peter Ganz; Li-Ming Gan; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  No evidence of cardiovascular toxicity in workers exposed below 5 ppm carbon disulfide.

Authors:  Jérôme Domergue; Dominique Lison; Vincent Haufroid
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  In-hospital prognosis of first-ever noncardiogenic ischemic stroke in patients with and without indication for prestroke antiplatelet therapy: Chinese Stroke Center Alliance.

Authors:  Yu-Yuan Xu; Hong-Qiu Gu; Zi-Xiao Li; Yun-Yun Xiong; Qi Zhou; Li-Ping Liu; Xing-Quan Zhao; Yi-Long Wang; Xia Meng; Yong-Jun Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

7.  Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy on SCORE-Estimated Total Cardiovascular Risk: Results from an Open-Label, Multinational Investigation-The POWER Survey.

Authors:  Guy De Backer; Robert J Petrella; Assen R Goudev; Ghazi Ahmad Radaideh; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Atul Pathak
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 8.  Erectile dysfunction and central obesity: an Italian perspective.

Authors:  Giovanni Corona; Giulia Rastrelli; Sandra Filippi; Linda Vignozzi; Edoardo Mannucci; Mario Maggi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Multifactorial Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome: Relevance for a Precision Approach to Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk and Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Baragetti; Alberico Luigi Catapano; Paolo Magni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels, endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Konstantinos Mourouzis; Gerasimos Siasos; Evangelos Oikonomou; Marina Zaromitidou; Vicky Tsigkou; Alexis Antonopoulos; Evanthia Bletsa; Panagiota Stampouloglou; Konstantinos Vlasis; Manolis Vavuranakis; Dimitris Tousoulis
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.876

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.