Literature DB >> 22220581

Bacterial endophyte communities of two wheatgrass varieties following propagation in different growing media.

D Ringelberg1, K Foley, C M Reynolds.   

Abstract

Bacterial endophyte communities of two wheatgrass varieties currently being used in the revegetation of military training ranges were studied. Culturable and direct 16S rDNA PCR amplification techniques were used to describe bacterial communities present in Siberian and slender wheatgrass seeds, leaf tissues, and root tissues following propagation in either sand or a peat-based growing mix. Our hypothesis was that the resulting plant endophytic communities would be distinct, showing not only the presence of endophytes originating from the seed but also the characteristics of growth in the two different growing media. Both culture and culture-independent assays showed the likely translocation of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Gammaproteobacteria from seed to mature plant tissues as well as subsequent colonization by exogenous organisms. Statistical analysis of 16S terminal restriction fragment profiles identified growing media as having a greater significant effect on the formation of the endpoint endophytic communities than either plant tissue or wheatgrass variety. In silico digests of the ribosomal database produced putative identifications indicating an increase in overall species diversity and increased relative abundances of Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria following propagation in sand and Betaproteobacteria following propagation in the peat-based growing mix. Results indicated a substantial translocation of endophytes from seed to mature plant tissues for both growing media and that growing medium was a dominant determinant of the final taxonomy of the endpoint plant endophytic communities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22220581     DOI: 10.1139/w11-122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  8 in total

1.  Effect of soil chemical fertilization on the diversity and composition of the tomato endophytic diazotrophic community at different stages of growth.

Authors:  Mónica M Collavino; E V Ramos Cabrera; Cecilia Bruno; O Mario Aguilar
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Analysis of Bacterial Communities in White Clover Seeds via High-Throughput Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene.

Authors:  Wenna Gao; Chunsheng Zheng; Yahong Lei; Weigang Kuang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Evaluating the rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial microbiome of pioneering pines in an aggregate mining ecosystem post-disturbance.

Authors:  Kiran Preet Padda; Akshit Puri; Nguyen Khoi Nguyen; Timothy J Philpott; Chris P Chanway
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.993

4.  Overhauling the Effect of Surface Sterilization on Analysis of Endophytes in Tea Plants.

Authors:  Yueer Yu; Zimeng Chen; Hengtong Xie; Xiaoxiao Feng; Yuefei Wang; Ping Xu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Transmission of Bacterial Endophytes.

Authors:  Anna Carolin Frank; Jessica Paola Saldierna Guzmán; Jackie E Shay
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  Change in abundance of three phytophagous mite species (Acari: Eriophyidae, Tetranychidae) on quackgrass in the presence of choke disease.

Authors:  Brian G Rector; Marcin Czarnoleski; Anna Skoracka; Marlena Lembicz
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Developmental Peculiarities and Seed-Borne Endophytes in Quinoa: Omnipresent, Robust Bacilli Contribute to Plant Fitness.

Authors:  Andrea Pitzschke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  What Is There in Seeds? Vertically Transmitted Endophytic Resources for Sustainable Improvement in Plant Growth.

Authors:  Raheem Shahzad; Abdul L Khan; Saqib Bilal; Sajjad Asaf; In-Jung Lee
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.