Literature DB >> 22220219

Clinical use of dexmedetomidine in monitored anesthesia care.

Soo Kyung Lee1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220219      PMCID: PMC3249564          DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


× No keyword cloud information.
Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is useful for various clinical fields such as minimally invasive surgery, gastrointestinal endoscopy, and interventional or radiological procedures. It provides suitable intraoperative conditions as well as comfort for patients. The commonly used drugs are midazolam, propofol, and opioids such as fentanyl, alfentanil or remifentanil. Occasionally, the administration of sedatives or hypnotics in conjunction with analgesics can cause significant respiratory depression and/or transient upper airway obstruction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selevtive α2-adrenoceptor agonist with eight times higher specificity for the receptor compared to clonidine. It provides excellent sedation and analgesia with minimal respiratory depression [1]. Recent multicenter trial indicated that it was an effective baseline sedative for patients undergoing a broad range of surgical procedures under MAC, providing greater patient satisfaction, less opioid requirements, and less respiratory depression compared with the placebo [2]. In patients undergoing diagnostic transesophageal echocardiography, the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine proved to be equivalent to that of the standard therapy using midazolam and fentanyl without increasing the incidences of respiratory depression or oxygen desaturation. It also seemed to be better in terms of hemodynamic results [3]. Dexmedetomidine with fentanyl could be used safely and effectively for sedation and analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [4]. In the current issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology [5], the authors demonstrated dexmedetomidine was a useful sedative drug for MAC in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery, and in aspects of patients' satisfaction and cardiovascular stability, it was superior to the combination of propofol and alfentanil. However, Muller et al. [6] have showed dexmedetomidine alone was not as effective as propofol with fentanyl for providing conscious sedation during ERCP. Furthermore, it was associated with greater hemodynamic instability and longer recovery time. Spontaneously breathing pediatrics patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with dexmedetomidine and ketamine experienced insufficient sedation and analgesia and prolonged recovery compared to propofol and ketamine [7]. Dexmedetomidine leads to dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma catecholamine concentrations [8,9]. Higher concentrations of this drug can also result in systemic and pulmonary hypertension [10]. Severe bradycardia progressing to pulseless electrical activity caused by dexmedetomidine was reported in a 74-year-old man who experienced a postoperative myocardial infarction [11]. These adverse effects on cardiovascular system might limit the use of high concentrations of dexmedetomidine, and clinicians must always be careful when using this drug, especially in patients with significant cardiac disease. Rapid administration of dexmedetomidine can lead to transient hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia, and therefore, administration of a loading dose for over 10 minutes is recommended [12]. The drug is sometimes used without a loading dose [11]. The report, published in the current issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology [5], suggested continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine adjusted depending on the sedation scale without a loading dose neither disturbing cardiovascular stability nor delaying discharge. It is necessary to monitor blood pressure even after discontinuation of dexmedetomidine as its infusion for 2 minutes has induced a long-lasting decrease in mean arterial blood pressure in the healthy volunteers, with a maximum decrease of 14% for 0.25 µg/kg and 16% for 0.5 µg/kg at 60 minutes after the discontinuance of the drug [13]. Although dexmedetomidine is an attractive drug for MAC, further studies on appropriate dosage according to patients' age or race or the presence of other drugs and on the method of infusion suitable for each procedures are required for safe use. The use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients is not yet approved in Korea.
  12 in total

1.  Dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  N Bhana; K L Goa; K J McClellan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  A randomized, controlled trial on dexmedetomidine for providing adequate sedation and hemodynamic control for awake, diagnostic transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Lebron Cooper; Keith Candiotti; Christopher Gallagher; Ernesto Grenier; Kristopher L Arheart; Michael E Barron
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

Authors:  T J Ebert; J E Hall; J A Barney; T D Uhrich; M D Colinco
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Effects of dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, on hemodynamic control mechanisms.

Authors:  A Kallio; M Scheinin; M Koulu; R Ponkilainen; H Ruskoaho; O Viinamäki; H Scheinin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP.

Authors:  Suzana Muller; Silvia M Borowics; Elaine A F Fortis; Luciana C Stefani; Gabriela Soares; Ismael Maguilnik; Helenice P Breyer; Maria Paz L Hidalgo; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Dexmedetomidine infusion for sedation during fiberoptic intubation: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Stuart A Grant; Dara S Breslin; David B MacLeod; David Gleason; Gavin Martin
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Dexmedetomidine-associated bradycardia progressing to pulseless electrical activity: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anthony T Gerlach; Claire V Murphy
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenan Kaygusuz; Gokhan Gokce; Sinan Gursoy; Semih Ayan; Caner Mimaroglu; Yener Gultekin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.

Authors:  Keith A Candiotti; Sergio D Bergese; Paula M Bokesch; Marc A Feldman; Wayne Wisemandle; Alex Y Bekker
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Dexmedetomidine is effective for monitored anesthesia care in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hyo-Seok Na; In-Ae Song; Hong-Sik Park; Jung-Won Hwang; Sang-Hwan Do; Chong-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-12-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of 2 effect-site concentrations of remifentanil with midazolam during percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty under monitored anesthesia care: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Yi-Ting Tsai; Yi-Hsuan Huang; Ke-Li Wu; Ren-Chih Huang; Bo-Feng Lin; Shun-Ming Chan; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Monitored anesthesia care in and outside the operating room.

Authors:  Hye-Min Sohn; Jung-Hee Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-06-22

3.  The effects of different loading doses of dexmedetomidine on sedation.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Sim; Hyun Jeong Yu; Sang Tae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-07-29

4.  The Efficacy of Hypotensive Agents on Intraoperative Bleeding and Recovery Following General Anesthesia for Nasal Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Do Hyun Kim; Junuk Lee; Sung Won Kim; Se Hwan Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.372

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.