Literature DB >> 22220110

(E,E)-N,N-Bis(2,6-difluoro-benzyl-idene)ethane-1,2-diamine.

Mohammad Khaledi Sardashti, Reza Kia, William Clegg, Ross W Harrington.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(16)H(12)F(4)N(2), comprises half of the potentially bidentate Schiff base ligand, with an inversion centre located at the mid-point of the central C-C bond. The crystal packing is stabilized by inter-molecular C-H⋯N and π-π inter-actions [centroid-centroid distance = 3.6793 (12) Å and inter-planar spacing = 3.4999 (7) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220110      PMCID: PMC3247492          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to the synthesis and structural variations of Schiff base ligands and their complexes, see: Granovski et al. (1993 ▶); Elmali et al. (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C16H12F4N2 M = 308.28 Monoclinic, a = 7.3304 (10) Å b = 10.5414 (15) Å c = 9.2106 (13) Å β = 105.487 (2)° V = 685.89 (17) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.34 × 0.30 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.958, T max = 0.987 4573 measured reflections 1203 independent reflections 1057 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.031

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043 wR(F 2) = 0.124 S = 1.15 1203 reflections 100 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044692/su2335sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044692/su2335Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044692/su2335Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C16H12F4N2F(000) = 316
Mr = 308.28Dx = 1.493 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 4055 reflections
a = 7.3304 (10) Åθ = 2.9–28.3°
b = 10.5414 (15) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 9.2106 (13) ÅT = 150 K
β = 105.487 (2)°Plate, yellow
V = 685.89 (17) Å30.34 × 0.30 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector diffractometer1203 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1057 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005)k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.958, Tmax = 0.987l = −10→10
4573 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.124H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.15w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0646P)2 + 0.2701P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1203 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
100 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Experimental. The low-temperature data were collected with the Oxford Cyrosystems Cryostream low-temperature attachment.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.24616 (17)0.28505 (10)0.59397 (12)0.0409 (4)
F20.29841 (19)0.71120 (10)0.45850 (14)0.0434 (4)
N10.4481 (2)0.46153 (14)0.79618 (16)0.0297 (4)
C10.5503 (3)0.51558 (19)0.9411 (2)0.0334 (5)
H1A0.55900.60880.93170.040*
H1B0.68050.48090.97170.040*
C20.3868 (2)0.53796 (16)0.6894 (2)0.0277 (4)
H20.41230.62560.70870.033*
C30.2783 (2)0.50109 (15)0.53673 (18)0.0244 (4)
C40.2091 (2)0.37948 (16)0.49141 (19)0.0272 (4)
C50.1031 (2)0.35046 (18)0.3480 (2)0.0311 (5)
H50.05940.26640.32250.037*
C60.0615 (3)0.44634 (19)0.2419 (2)0.0332 (5)
H6−0.01230.42790.14260.040*
C70.1257 (3)0.56853 (19)0.2780 (2)0.0330 (5)
H70.09740.63450.20520.040*
C80.2317 (2)0.59168 (16)0.4228 (2)0.0287 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0569 (8)0.0217 (6)0.0346 (6)−0.0067 (5)−0.0046 (5)0.0054 (4)
F20.0677 (8)0.0190 (6)0.0419 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0118 (6)0.0036 (5)
N10.0339 (8)0.0273 (8)0.0247 (8)0.0032 (6)0.0022 (6)−0.0038 (6)
C10.0331 (10)0.0355 (10)0.0280 (10)−0.0021 (8)0.0020 (8)−0.0042 (8)
C20.0331 (9)0.0210 (9)0.0287 (9)−0.0031 (7)0.0077 (7)−0.0021 (7)
C30.0259 (8)0.0230 (9)0.0248 (9)0.0035 (7)0.0075 (7)−0.0012 (7)
C40.0306 (9)0.0228 (9)0.0271 (9)0.0030 (7)0.0059 (7)0.0027 (7)
C50.0312 (9)0.0292 (10)0.0308 (10)−0.0017 (7)0.0044 (8)−0.0059 (7)
C60.0300 (9)0.0421 (11)0.0251 (9)0.0044 (8)0.0032 (7)−0.0014 (8)
C70.0370 (10)0.0349 (10)0.0278 (10)0.0101 (8)0.0098 (8)0.0082 (8)
C80.0357 (10)0.0198 (9)0.0324 (10)0.0042 (7)0.0124 (8)0.0007 (7)
F1—C41.349 (2)C3—C81.392 (2)
F2—C81.360 (2)C3—C41.401 (3)
N1—C21.258 (2)C4—C51.376 (3)
N1—C11.461 (2)C5—C61.382 (3)
C1—C1i1.502 (4)C5—H50.950
C1—H1A0.990C6—C71.381 (3)
C1—H1B0.990C6—H60.950
C2—C31.471 (2)C7—C81.374 (3)
C2—H20.950C7—H70.950
C2—N1—C1116.98 (16)F1—C4—C3118.52 (15)
N1—C1—C1i110.12 (19)C5—C4—C3123.79 (16)
N1—C1—H1A109.6C4—C5—C6118.53 (17)
C1i—C1—H1A109.6C4—C5—H5120.7
N1—C1—H1B109.6C6—C5—H5120.7
C1i—C1—H1B109.6C7—C6—C5120.98 (17)
H1A—C1—H1B108.1C7—C6—H6119.5
N1—C2—C3124.56 (16)C5—C6—H6119.5
N1—C2—H2117.7C8—C7—C6117.89 (18)
C3—C2—H2117.7C8—C7—H7121.1
C8—C3—C4114.00 (15)C6—C7—H7121.1
C8—C3—C2120.03 (15)F2—C8—C7118.23 (17)
C4—C3—C2125.95 (15)F2—C8—C3116.95 (16)
F1—C4—C5117.69 (16)C7—C8—C3124.81 (17)
C2—N1—C1—C1i119.1 (2)C3—C4—C5—C6−0.1 (3)
C1—N1—C2—C3−178.90 (15)C4—C5—C6—C70.4 (3)
N1—C2—C3—C8−174.14 (17)C5—C6—C7—C8−0.1 (3)
N1—C2—C3—C47.6 (3)C6—C7—C8—F2178.75 (15)
C8—C3—C4—F1−179.76 (15)C6—C7—C8—C3−0.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4—F1−1.4 (3)C4—C3—C8—F2−178.50 (14)
C8—C3—C4—C5−0.5 (3)C2—C3—C8—F23.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5177.93 (16)C4—C3—C8—C70.8 (3)
F1—C4—C5—C6179.17 (15)C2—C3—C8—C7−177.67 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5···N1ii0.952.533.471 (2)171
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C5—H5⋯N1i0.952.533.471 (2)171

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  [N,N'-Bis(5-bromosalicylidene)-1,3-diaminopropane]nickel(II) and [N, N'-bis(5-chlorosalicylidene)-1,3-diaminopropane]copper(II).

Authors:  A Elmali; C T Zeyrek; Y Elerman; I Svoboda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.