Literature DB >> 22220047

2-Nitro-anilinium bromide.

R Anitha, S Athimoolam, S Asath Bahadur, M Gunasekaran.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(6)H(7)N(2)O(2) (+)·Br(-), is isomorphous with 2-nitro-anilinium chloride and contains an characteristic intra-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bond, forming an S(6) motif. Inter-molecular N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds occur in the crystal structure. Two zigzag chains of C(2) (1)(4) motifs extend along the b-axis direction. These primary chain motifs inter-sect like a double helix structure, leading to R(6) (3)(12) ring motifs, which are arranged in tandem along the b axis. Hence, hydro-philic layers are generated at z = 1/4 and 3/4, which are sandwiched between alternate hydro-phobic layers across z = 0 and 1/2.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220047      PMCID: PMC3247429          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Herbstein (1965 ▶); Dhaneshwar et al. (1978 ▶); Saminathan & Sivakumar (2007 ▶); Ploug-Sørensen & Andersen (1983) ▶. For hydrogen-bonding motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶); Desiraju (1989 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H7N2O2 +·Br M = 219.05 Orthorhombic, a = 8.0268 (8) Å b = 8.1242 (7) Å c = 23.7912 (19) Å V = 1551.5 (2) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.25 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.21 × 0.19 × 0.17 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer 12000 measured reflections 1372 independent reflections 1107 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.085

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031 wR(F 2) = 0.076 S = 0.96 1372 reflections 112 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL/PC; molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041948/ff2032sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041948/ff2032Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041948/ff2032Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H7N2O2+·BrF(000) = 864
Mr = 219.05Dx = 1.876 Mg m3Dm = 1.86 (1) Mg m3Dm measured by Flotation technique using a liquid-mixture of carbon tetrachloride and bromoform
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2610 reflections
a = 8.0268 (8) Åθ = 2.6–24.6°
b = 8.1242 (7) ŵ = 5.25 mm1
c = 23.7912 (19) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1551.5 (2) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.21 × 0.19 × 0.17 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1107 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.085
graphiteθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.7°
ω scansh = −9→9
12000 measured reflectionsk = −9→9
1372 independent reflectionsl = −28→28
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.076H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.96w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.046P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1372 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
112 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.38 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.79124 (4)0.19991 (4)0.286284 (13)0.04040 (17)
C10.8664 (4)0.5387 (3)0.09113 (11)0.0305 (7)
C20.8275 (3)0.4633 (3)0.14194 (11)0.0282 (7)
C30.6626 (4)0.4451 (4)0.15682 (13)0.0348 (7)
H30.63470.39670.19100.042*
C40.5389 (4)0.4989 (5)0.12095 (13)0.0432 (8)
H40.42760.48340.13050.052*
C50.5790 (4)0.5754 (4)0.07105 (13)0.0462 (9)
H50.49480.61280.04740.055*
C60.7426 (4)0.5965 (4)0.05606 (13)0.0410 (8)
H60.76980.64930.02260.049*
N20.9543 (4)0.4115 (4)0.18231 (12)0.0329 (6)
N11.0379 (4)0.5526 (3)0.07159 (10)0.0399 (7)
O11.1385 (3)0.4512 (3)0.08824 (9)0.0533 (7)
O21.0721 (3)0.6593 (3)0.03787 (11)0.0675 (8)
H1N1.020 (4)0.348 (4)0.1700 (14)0.040 (11)*
H2N1.020 (7)0.494 (6)0.1982 (18)0.100 (16)*
H3N0.902 (6)0.351 (5)0.2156 (15)0.070 (12)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0387 (2)0.0383 (2)0.0443 (3)0.00825 (15)0.00844 (14)0.00908 (14)
C10.0328 (16)0.0321 (17)0.0266 (16)0.0011 (14)0.0013 (13)−0.0034 (12)
C20.0276 (15)0.0292 (16)0.0277 (16)0.0021 (12)−0.0041 (12)−0.0039 (12)
C30.0304 (16)0.0439 (19)0.0300 (16)−0.0013 (15)0.0029 (13)−0.0014 (14)
C40.0295 (17)0.058 (2)0.0422 (19)0.0049 (17)−0.0016 (15)−0.0075 (17)
C50.041 (2)0.058 (2)0.0395 (18)0.0158 (17)−0.0142 (15)−0.0036 (17)
C60.050 (2)0.0449 (19)0.0280 (17)0.0063 (17)−0.0044 (14)0.0035 (14)
N20.0288 (15)0.0392 (16)0.0306 (15)−0.0038 (15)−0.0048 (12)0.0051 (14)
N10.0394 (16)0.0507 (18)0.0296 (14)−0.0036 (15)0.0023 (12)−0.0026 (13)
O10.0339 (13)0.0780 (19)0.0481 (14)0.0083 (13)0.0047 (11)0.0051 (13)
O20.0715 (19)0.0676 (16)0.0635 (17)−0.0107 (16)0.0210 (14)0.0255 (14)
C1—C61.380 (4)C5—C61.372 (5)
C1—C21.391 (4)C5—H50.9300
C1—N11.458 (4)C6—H60.9300
C2—C31.378 (4)N2—H1N0.79 (3)
C2—N21.461 (4)N2—H2N0.93 (6)
C3—C41.380 (4)N2—H3N1.02 (4)
C3—H30.9300N1—O21.213 (3)
C4—C51.378 (5)N1—O11.220 (3)
C4—H40.9300
C6—C1—C2120.9 (3)C4—C5—H5119.9
C6—C1—N1117.5 (3)C5—C6—C1119.3 (3)
C2—C1—N1121.6 (3)C5—C6—H6120.3
C3—C2—C1119.1 (3)C1—C6—H6120.3
C3—C2—N2118.0 (3)C2—N2—H1N114 (2)
C1—C2—N2122.8 (3)C2—N2—H2N117 (3)
C2—C3—C4119.9 (3)H1N—N2—H2N103 (4)
C2—C3—H3120.1C2—N2—H3N111 (2)
C4—C3—H3120.1H1N—N2—H3N104 (3)
C5—C4—C3120.5 (3)H2N—N2—H3N106 (3)
C5—C4—H4119.8O2—N1—O1123.2 (3)
C3—C4—H4119.8O2—N1—C1118.7 (3)
C6—C5—C4120.3 (3)O1—N1—C1118.0 (3)
C6—C5—H5119.9
C6—C1—C2—C30.7 (4)C4—C5—C6—C10.7 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C3−176.3 (3)C2—C1—C6—C5−1.6 (5)
C6—C1—C2—N2−175.3 (3)N1—C1—C6—C5175.5 (3)
N1—C1—C2—N27.8 (4)C6—C1—N1—O225.6 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C41.1 (5)C2—C1—N1—O2−157.3 (3)
N2—C2—C3—C4177.3 (3)C6—C1—N1—O1−151.2 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−2.0 (5)C2—C1—N1—O125.9 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C61.1 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H1N···O10.79 (3)2.32 (3)2.702 (4)111 (3)
N2—H1N···Br1i0.79 (3)2.70 (4)3.291 (3)133 (3)
N2—H2N···Br1ii0.93 (6)2.29 (6)3.197 (3)165 (4)
N2—H3N···Br11.02 (4)2.26 (4)3.284 (3)176 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H1N⋯O10.79 (3)2.32 (3)2.702 (4)111 (3)
N2—H1N⋯Br1i0.79 (3)2.70 (4)3.291 (3)133 (3)
N2—H2N⋯Br1ii0.93 (6)2.29 (6)3.197 (3)165 (4)
N2—H3N⋯Br11.02 (4)2.26 (4)3.284 (3)176 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  4-Chloro-anilinium 3-carb-oxy-prop-2-enoate.

Authors:  R Anitha; S Athimoolam; S Asath Bahadur; M Gunasekaran
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.