Literature DB >> 2221992

The grand multipara--still an obstetrical challenge?

P Sipilä1, L von Wendt, A L Hartikainen-Sorri.   

Abstract

To study whether grand multiparity (parity of 6 or more) still carries risk, we studied two birth cohorts in northern Finland: the first comprised 12,231 births to 12,068 mothers in 1966 and the second comprised 9478 births to 9362 mothers in 1985/86. The percentage of grand multipara decreased from 7.7 to 4.0. The grand multipara made fewer antenatal visits than the others. The proportion of grand multipara referred to maternity outpatient clinics of hospitals was smaller, but the mean number of visits was higher than of lower parity women. The mean number of admissions to hospital was similar in both groups but grand multipara stayed longer in hospital, smoked less (4.3% vs. 22.7%) and had a higher incidence of essential hypertension than women of lower parity. The grand multipara had fewer caesarean sections (7.5% vs. 14.1%) and vacuum extractions (0.5% vs. 5.1%) but more inductions of labour (33.1% vs. 23.5%) than mothers of lower parity. The number of low birth weight (LBW) infants (less than 2500 grams), stillbirths and neonatal deaths (before 28 days) was significantly lower in 1985/86 than in 1966 in women of lower parity but there was no such change in grand multipara. However, the percentage of LBW infants was smaller among grand multipara than among women of lower parity in both cohorts (2.7% vs. 4.1%, NS). The stillbirth plus neonatal death rate in grand multipara was higher than in women of lower parity (1.9% vs. 0.9%, P less than 0.05) partly because of a higher incidence of major congenital anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2221992     DOI: 10.1007/bf02389543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  15 in total

1.  A study of 812 grand multiparas.

Authors:  J H NELSON; M W SANDMEYER
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The problem of the grand multipara.

Authors:  E L SCHRAM
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1954-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The grandmultipara: is she still a risk?

Authors:  A I Eidelman; R Kamar; M S Schimmel; E Bar-On
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A prospective longitudinal study of social, psychological and obstetric factors in pregnancy: response rates and demographic characteristics of the 8556 respondents.

Authors:  J D Keeping; J M Najman; J Morrison; J S Western; M J Andersen; G M Williams
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-03

5.  Young maternal age and adverse neonatal outcome.

Authors:  E R McAnarney
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1987-10

Review 6.  Groups at risk in low birth weight infants and perinatal mortality.

Authors:  P Rantakallio
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1969

7.  Does grand multiparity affect fetal outcome?

Authors:  D S Seidman; R Gale; P E Slater; P Ever-Hadani; S Harlap
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases.

Authors:  K Fuchs; B A Peretz; R Marcovici; E Paldi; I Timor-Tritsh
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Advanced maternal age: the mature gravida.

Authors:  D S Kirz; W Dorchester; R K Freeman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The obstetric performance of the grand multipara.

Authors:  A Chang; P Larkin; E J Esler; R Condie; J Morrison
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-03-05       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of high parity on occurrence of some fetal growth indices: a cohort study.

Authors:  Yahya M Al-Farsi; Daniel R Brooks; Martha M Werler; Howard J Cabral; Mohammed A Al-Shafaee; Henk C Wallenburg
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-07-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.