Literature DB >> 22219774

catena-Poly[[aqua-copper(II)]-μ(2)-imino-diacetato-κO,N,O':O'].

Qin Zhong1, Yu-Hong Wang, Xue-Ting Zhang.   

Abstract

In the title compound, [Cu(C(4)H(5)O(4))(H(2)O)](n), the imino-diacetate (ida) ligands link the n class="Chemical">Cu(II) atoms into polymeric zigzag chains running along [010]. Each Cu(II) ion is five-coordinated in a distorted square-pyramidal geometry by one N and two O atoms from an ida ligand, one O atom from the neighbouring ida ligand and one water O atom. In the crystal, the polymeric chains are held together via inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22219774      PMCID: PMC3246954          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of coordination polymers containing bridging carboxyl­ate groups, see: Dey et al. (2003 ▶); Wu et al. (2009 ▶); Zhang et al. (2008 ▶). For coordination n class="Chemical">polymers with imino­diacetic acid, see: Bresciani-Pahor et al. (1984 ▶); Ren et al. (2003 ▶); Song et al. (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu(C4H5O4)(n class="Chemical">H2O)] M = 212.65 Monoclinic, a = 6.563 (3) Å b = 9.870 (4) Å c = 10.876 (4) Å β = 99.802 (8)° V = 694.2 (5) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 3.12 mm−1 T = 223 K 0.40 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998 ▶) T min = 0.369, T max = 0.652 3854 measured reflections 1571 independent reflections 1358 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.082 S = 1.02 1571 reflections 110 parameters 3 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.48 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2001 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041286/cv5163sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811041286/cv5163Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(C4H5O4)(H2O)]F(000) = 428
Mr = 212.65Dx = 2.035 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3372 reflections
a = 6.563 (3) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 9.870 (4) ŵ = 3.12 mm1
c = 10.876 (4) ÅT = 223 K
β = 99.802 (8)°Block, blue
V = 694.2 (5) Å30.40 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Saturn diffractometer1571 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1358 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 14.63 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.2°
ω scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998)k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.369, Tmax = 0.652l = −9→14
3854 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.082H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.046P)2 + 0.157P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1571 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
110 parametersΔρmax = 0.45 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −0.48 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.85030 (5)0.23532 (3)0.75251 (3)0.02015 (14)
O10.6802 (4)0.2321 (2)0.5873 (2)0.0312 (5)
O20.4101 (3)0.3228 (3)0.4674 (2)0.0378 (6)
O30.9803 (3)0.4446 (2)0.7449 (2)0.0312 (5)
O40.9274 (3)0.64968 (19)0.8186 (2)0.0265 (5)
O50.9679 (4)0.1781 (3)0.9246 (2)0.0454 (6)
H5A0.897 (6)0.212 (4)0.978 (3)0.054*
H5B1.1022 (18)0.184 (5)0.945 (4)0.054*
N10.6164 (4)0.3497 (2)0.7986 (2)0.0200 (5)
H11A0.546 (4)0.303 (3)0.844 (3)0.024*
C10.4669 (4)0.3788 (3)0.6828 (3)0.0263 (6)
H1A0.46390.47670.66740.032*
H1B0.32820.35110.69490.032*
C20.5202 (5)0.3069 (3)0.5707 (3)0.0256 (6)
C30.7073 (4)0.4735 (3)0.8622 (3)0.0226 (6)
H3A0.75680.45370.95050.027*
H3B0.60110.54400.85710.027*
C40.8864 (4)0.5246 (3)0.8023 (3)0.0208 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0235 (2)0.0177 (2)0.0204 (2)0.00209 (13)0.00672 (14)0.00000 (13)
O10.0320 (12)0.0387 (12)0.0226 (12)0.0087 (10)0.0042 (9)−0.0061 (9)
O20.0342 (12)0.0540 (14)0.0233 (13)0.0085 (11)−0.0003 (10)−0.0008 (11)
O30.0306 (12)0.0195 (10)0.0491 (15)−0.0004 (9)0.0229 (10)−0.0010 (9)
O40.0341 (11)0.0187 (9)0.0297 (12)−0.0081 (9)0.0138 (9)−0.0055 (8)
O50.0394 (14)0.0669 (18)0.0307 (15)0.0129 (14)0.0085 (11)0.0028 (12)
N10.0231 (12)0.0185 (11)0.0202 (13)−0.0033 (10)0.0085 (9)−0.0004 (9)
C10.0233 (14)0.0289 (15)0.0263 (17)0.0006 (13)0.0030 (12)−0.0012 (12)
C20.0284 (16)0.0253 (14)0.0235 (16)−0.0030 (13)0.0055 (12)0.0000 (12)
C30.0265 (15)0.0171 (12)0.0263 (16)−0.0019 (11)0.0101 (12)−0.0053 (11)
C40.0203 (14)0.0199 (13)0.0215 (15)−0.0032 (11)0.0016 (11)0.0019 (11)
Cu1—O11.948 (2)O5—H5B0.873 (10)
Cu1—O4i1.955 (2)N1—C31.478 (3)
Cu1—O51.981 (3)N1—C11.486 (4)
Cu1—N12.036 (2)N1—H11A0.863 (10)
Cu1—O32.241 (2)C1—C21.503 (4)
O1—C21.271 (4)C1—H1A0.9800
O2—C21.238 (4)C1—H1B0.9800
O3—C41.234 (3)C3—C41.523 (4)
O4—C41.270 (3)C3—H3A0.9800
O4—Cu1ii1.955 (2)C3—H3B0.9800
O5—H5A0.873 (10)
O1—Cu1—O4i88.70 (10)C1—N1—H11A104 (2)
O1—Cu1—O5159.50 (11)Cu1—N1—H11A110 (2)
O4i—Cu1—O593.05 (10)N1—C1—C2112.6 (2)
O1—Cu1—N184.15 (10)N1—C1—H1A109.1
O4i—Cu1—N1168.97 (9)C2—C1—H1A109.1
O5—Cu1—N196.58 (10)N1—C1—H1B109.1
O1—Cu1—O398.23 (9)C2—C1—H1B109.1
O4i—Cu1—O393.97 (8)H1A—C1—H1B107.8
O5—Cu1—O3102.01 (11)O2—C2—O1122.9 (3)
N1—Cu1—O378.80 (8)O2—C2—C1119.7 (3)
C2—O1—Cu1116.8 (2)O1—C2—C1117.4 (3)
C4—O3—Cu1110.15 (17)N1—C3—C4110.7 (2)
C4—O4—Cu1ii121.34 (19)N1—C3—H3A109.5
Cu1—O5—H5A111 (3)C4—C3—H3A109.5
Cu1—O5—H5B116 (3)N1—C3—H3B109.5
H5A—O5—H5B116 (4)C4—C3—H3B109.5
C3—N1—C1113.1 (2)H3A—C3—H3B108.1
C3—N1—Cu1108.17 (17)O3—C4—O4125.4 (3)
C1—N1—Cu1108.40 (17)O3—C4—C3119.5 (2)
C3—N1—H11A113 (2)O4—C4—C3115.0 (2)
O4i—Cu1—O1—C2−164.3 (2)O3—Cu1—N1—C193.24 (18)
O5—Cu1—O1—C2100.5 (3)C3—N1—C1—C2125.0 (3)
N1—Cu1—O1—C27.3 (2)Cu1—N1—C1—C25.1 (3)
O3—Cu1—O1—C2−70.5 (2)Cu1—O1—C2—O2173.5 (2)
O1—Cu1—O3—C4100.6 (2)Cu1—O1—C2—C1−6.1 (3)
O4i—Cu1—O3—C4−170.2 (2)N1—C1—C2—O2−179.3 (3)
O5—Cu1—O3—C4−76.2 (2)N1—C1—C2—O10.3 (4)
N1—Cu1—O3—C418.2 (2)C1—N1—C3—C4−82.1 (3)
O1—Cu1—N1—C3−129.37 (18)Cu1—N1—C3—C438.0 (3)
O4i—Cu1—N1—C3−79.5 (5)Cu1—O3—C4—O4177.6 (2)
O5—Cu1—N1—C371.24 (19)Cu1—O3—C4—C3−1.3 (3)
O3—Cu1—N1—C3−29.75 (17)Cu1ii—O4—C4—O31.8 (4)
O1—Cu1—N1—C1−6.38 (17)Cu1ii—O4—C4—C3−179.27 (19)
O4i—Cu1—N1—C143.5 (5)N1—C3—C4—O3−24.3 (4)
O5—Cu1—N1—C1−165.77 (18)N1—C3—C4—O4156.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5—H5A···O1iii0.87 (1)2.08 (1)2.936 (4)168 (4)
O5—H5B···O2iv0.87 (1)1.99 (1)2.860 (4)171 (4)
N1—H11A···O2iii0.86 (1)2.13 (1)2.992 (3)173 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O5—H5A⋯O1i0.87 (1)2.08 (1)2.936 (4)168 (4)
O5—H5B⋯O2ii0.87 (1)1.99 (1)2.860 (4)171 (4)
N1—H11A⋯O2i0.86 (1)2.13 (1)2.992 (3)173 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Alkali metal cation (K+, Cs+) induced dissolution/reorganization of porous metal carboxylate coordination networks in water.

Authors:  Jing-Yun Wu; Miao-Tzu Ding; Yuh-Sheng Wen; Yen-Hsiang Liu; Kuang-Lieh Lu
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Topology analysis and nonlinear-optical-active properties of luminescent metal-organic framework materials based on zinc/lead isophthalates.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Ye-Yan Qin; Zhao-Ji Li; Qi-Pu Lin; Jian-Kai Cheng; Jian Zhang; Yuan-Gen Yao
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  A quasi-tetrahedral Cu4 cluster and a helical-chain copper (II) complex with single syn-anti carboxylate bridges: crystal structure and magnetic properties.

Authors:  Subrata Kumar Dey; Bappaditya Bag; K M Abdul Malik; M Salah El Fallah; Joan Ribas; Samiran Mitra
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-06-30       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Nanoporous lanthanide-copper(II) coordination polymers: syntheses and crystal structures of [[M2(Cu3(iminodiacetate)6)].8 H2O]n (M=La, Nd, Eu).

Authors:  Yan-Ping Ren; La-Sheng Long; Bing-Wei Mao; You-Zhu Yuan; Rong-Bin Huang; Lan-Sun Zheng
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 15.336

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.