AIM: To clarify human papillomavirus (HPV) involvement in carcinogenesis of the upper digestive tract of virological and pathological analyses. METHODS: The present study examined the presence of HPV in squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (n = 71), and esophagus (n = 166) collected from Japan, Pakistan and Colombia, with different HPV exposure risk and genetic backgrounds. The viral load and physical status of HPV16 and HPV16-E6 variants were examined. Comparison of p53 and p16(INK4a) expression in HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases was also made. RESULTS: HPV16 was found in 39 (55%) oral carcinomas (OCs) and 24 (14%) esophageal carcinomas (ECs). This site-specific difference in HPV detection between OCs and ECs was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the geographical distribution of HPV16-E6 variants. Multiple infections of different HPV types were found in 13 ECs, but multiple infections were not found in OCs. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). The geometric means (95% confidence interval) of HPV16 viral load in OCs and ECs were 0.06 (0.02-0.18) and 0.12 (0.05-0.27) copies per cell, respectively. The expression of p16(INK4a) proteins was increased by the presence of HPV in ECs (53% and 33% in HPV-positive and -negative ECs, respectively; P = 0.036), and the high-risk type of the HPV genome was not detected in surrounding normal esophageal mucosa of HPV-positive ECs. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we cannot deny the possibility of HPV16 involvement in the carcinogenesis of the esophagus.
AIM: To clarify human papillomavirus (HPV) involvement in carcinogenesis of the upper digestive tract of virological and pathological analyses. METHODS: The present study examined the presence of HPV in squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (n = 71), and esophagus (n = 166) collected from Japan, Pakistan and Colombia, with different HPV exposure risk and genetic backgrounds. The viral load and physical status of HPV16 and HPV16-E6 variants were examined. Comparison of p53 and p16(INK4a) expression in HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases was also made. RESULTS:HPV16 was found in 39 (55%) oral carcinomas (OCs) and 24 (14%) esophageal carcinomas (ECs). This site-specific difference in HPV detection between OCs and ECs was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the geographical distribution of HPV16-E6 variants. Multiple infections of different HPV types were found in 13 ECs, but multiple infections were not found in OCs. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). The geometric means (95% confidence interval) of HPV16 viral load in OCs and ECs were 0.06 (0.02-0.18) and 0.12 (0.05-0.27) copies per cell, respectively. The expression of p16(INK4a) proteins was increased by the presence of HPV in ECs (53% and 33% in HPV-positive and -negative ECs, respectively; P = 0.036), and the high-risk type of the HPV genome was not detected in surrounding normal esophageal mucosa of HPV-positive ECs. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we cannot deny the possibility of HPV16 involvement in the carcinogenesis of the esophagus.
Entities:
Keywords:
E6; Human papillomavirus; Physical status; Viral load; p16INK4a; p53
Authors: Ilvars Silins; Zhaohui Wang; Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist; Bo Frankendal; Uldis Vikmanis; Martin Sapp; John T Schiller; Joakim Dillner Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Annika Antonsson; Derek J Nancarrow; Ian S Brown; Adele C Green; Paul A Drew; David I Watson; Nicholas K Hayward; David C Whiteman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Guo-Fu Gao; Mark J Roth; Wen-Qiang Wei; Christian C Abnet; Feng Chen; Ning Lu; Fang-Hui Zhao; Xin-Qing Li; Guo-Qing Wang; Philip R Taylor; Qin-Jing Pan; Wen Chen; Sanford M Dawsey; You-Lin Qiao Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Gordana Halec; Markus Schmitt; Sam Egger; Christian C Abnet; Chantal Babb; Sanford M Dawsey; Christa Flechtenmacher; Tarik Gheit; Martin Hale; Dana Holzinger; Reza Malekzadeh; Philip R Taylor; Massimo Tommasino; Margaret I Urban; Tim Waterboer; Michael Pawlita; Freddy Sitas Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: J L Petrick; A B Wyss; A M Butler; C Cummings; X Sun; C Poole; J S Smith; A F Olshan Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 7.640