Literature DB >> 22219543

Effects of preference on verification of discriminated mands.

Eric W Boelter1, Louis P Hagopian.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that motivating operation (MO) manipulations may assist in assessing discriminated manding (Gutierrez et al., 2007). The current study partially replicated and extended previous research by varying access to concurrently available reinforcers with different preference values (i.e., MO manipulations). Manding did not occur (a) for reinforcers that were freely available and (b) for lower preference items when relatively higher preference reinforcers were freely available. Results further demonstrated the utility of manipulating MOs to verify discriminated mands but suggest that relative preference of alternative reinforcers should be controlled during these assessments.

Keywords:  discriminated manding; functional communication training; motivating operations; preference

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22219543      PMCID: PMC3251295          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information.

Authors:  Mark L Sundberg; Melisa Loeb; Lisa Hale; Peter Eigenheer
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2002

3.  Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.

Authors:  E G Carr; V M Durand
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

4.  Manipulating establishing operations to verify and establish stimulus control during mand training.

Authors:  Anibal Gutierrez; Timothy R Vollmer; Claudia L Dozier; John C Borrero; John T Rapp; Jason C Bourret; Dana Gadaire
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.