Literature DB >> 22219478

Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: 10-year experience.

Hunaid A Vohra1, Dimitrios Pousios, Robert N Whistance, Marcus P Haw, Clifford W Barlow, Sunil K Ohri, Steve A Livesey, Geoffrey M K Tsang.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES; This study aimed to investigate the early and late outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and patent grafts.
METHODS: Between January 2000 and March 2010, 104 patients (87 males) with previous CABG ± concomitant surgery and patent grafts underwent AVR. The median age of the patients was 75 years (range: 37-90 years; inter-quartile range: 69-79 years) and the mean logistic EuroScore was 25.37 ± 16.8. The median time since the previous operation was 9 years (range 1-25; inter-quartile range: 7-14 years). The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) had been used in 75 patients (72.1%) and remained patent in 72 cases (96.0%).
RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 7.7% (n = 8), which is less than the predicted mean logistic EuroScore. Isolated AVR was performed in 66 patients (63.5%). The LIMA was dissected and isolated (clamped or blocked with balloon) in 60 patients. The median hospital stay was 10 days (range: 4-183 days; inter-quartile range: 7-15.25 days). Nineteen patients (18.3%) had pulmonary complications, while 12 (11.5%) had acute kidney injury. Seven patients (6.7%) required permanent pacemaker. Six LIMAs (8.3%) were injured and repaired. Prolonged aortic cross-clamp (AXC) time (P = 0.038) and the presence of a previous LIMA graft (P = 0.045) were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 89.4 ± 0.3 and 81.5 ± 0.5%, respectively. Perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump use (P = 0.036), prolonged AXC time (P = 0.004) and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = 0.022) were associated with worse long-term overall survival on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: AVR post-CABG with patent grafts can be performed in high-risk patients with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears to be superior to published catheter-based interventions. In the absence of randomized trial data, we believe that open AVR remains the treatment of choice for aortic valve disease following prior CABG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22219478     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients at Intermediate Operative Risk With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael J Reardon; Robin H Heijmen; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Mathew R Williams; Steven J Yakubov; Daniel Watson; Neal S Kleiman; John Conte; Atul Chawla; David Hockmuth; George Petrossian; Newell Robinson; A Pieter Kappetein; Shuzhen Li; Jeffrey J Popma
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sharaf-Eldin Shehada; Yacine Elhmidi; Öznur Öztürk; Markus Kasel; Antonio H Frangieh; Fanar Mourad; Jaroslav Benedik; Jaafar El Bahi; Mohamed El Gabry; Matthias Thielmann; Heinz Jakob; Daniel Wendt
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Li; Jia-Yu Tsauo; Kai-Yu Jia; Yan-Biao Liao; Fan Xia; Zheng-Gang Zhao; Mao Chen; Yong Peng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

4.  Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Nestoras Papadopoulos; Nina Schiller; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Ralf Lehmann; Christian F Weber; Anton Moritz; Mirko Doss; Andreas Zierer
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.