Literature DB >> 22219352

Synchronous and symmetric migration of Drosophila caudal visceral mesoderm cells requires dual input by two FGF ligands.

Snehalata Kadam1, Srimoyee Ghosh, Angelike Stathopoulos.   

Abstract

Caudal visceral mesoderm (CVM) cells migrate synchronously towards the anterior of the Drosophila embryo as two distinct groups located on each side of the body, in order to specify longitudinal muscles that ensheath the gut. Little is known about the molecular cues that guide cells along this path, the longest migration of embryogenesis, except that they closely associate with trunk visceral mesoderm (TVM). The expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) heartless and its ligands, pyramus (pyr) and thisbe (ths), within CVM and TVM cells, respectively, suggested FGF signaling may influence CVM cell guidance. In FGF mutants, CVM cells die before reaching the anterior region of the TVM. However, an earlier phenotype observed was that the two cell clusters lose direction and converge at the midline. Live in vivo imaging and tracking analyses identified that the movements of CVM cells were slower and no longer synchronous. Moreover, CVM cells were found to cross over from one group to the other, disrupting bilateral symmetry, whereas such mixing was never observed in wild-type embryos. Ectopic expression of either Pyr or Ths was sufficient to redirect CVM cell movement, but only when the endogenous source of these ligands was absent. Collectively, our results show that FGF signaling regulates directional movement of CVM cells and that native presentation of both FGF ligands together is most effective at attracting cells. This study also has general implications, as it suggests that the activity supported by two FGF ligands in concert differs from their activities in isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22219352      PMCID: PMC3265058          DOI: 10.1242/dev.068791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  42 in total

1.  Crystal structures of two FGF-FGFR complexes reveal the determinants of ligand-receptor specificity.

Authors:  A N Plotnikov; S R Hubbard; J Schlessinger; M Mohammadi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-05-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back.

Authors:  Anne J Ridley; Martin A Schwartz; Keith Burridge; Richard A Firtel; Mark H Ginsberg; Gary Borisy; J Thomas Parsons; Alan Rick Horwitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The T-box-encoding Dorsocross genes function in amnioserosa development and the patterning of the dorsolateral germ band downstream of Dpp.

Authors:  Ingolf Reim; Hsiu-Hsiang Lee; Manfred Frasch
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Dual origin of the renal tubules in Drosophila: mesodermal cells integrate and polarize to establish secretory function.

Authors:  Barry Denholm; Vikram Sudarsan; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Ruben Artero; Peter Lawrence; Simon Maddrell; Mary Baylies; Helen Skaer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Alternate functions of the single-minded and rhomboid genes in development of the Drosophila ventral neuroectoderm.

Authors:  H Xiao; L A Hrdlicka; J R Nambu
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  Cellular pathways acting along the germband and in the amnioserosa may participate in germband retraction of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Authors:  R Goldman-Levi; C Miller; G Greenberg; E Gabai; N B Zak
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.203

7.  Regulation and function of Scr, exd, and hth in the Drosophila salivary gland.

Authors:  K D Henderson; D J Andrew
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila.

Authors:  N Azpiazu; M Frasch
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  dpp induces mesodermal gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  K Staehling-Hampton; F M Hoffmann; M K Baylies; E Rushton; M Bate
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Drosophila fork head domain protein crocodile is required for the establishment of head structures.

Authors:  U Häcker; E Kaufmann; C Hartmann; G Jürgens; W Knöchel; H Jäckle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  29 in total

1.  Dynamic expression of a Hydra FGF at boundaries and termini.

Authors:  Ellen Lange; Stephanie Bertrand; Oliver Holz; Nicole Rebscher; Monika Hassel
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Migrating cells control morphogenesis of substratum serving as track to promote directional movement of the collective.

Authors:  Frank Macabenta; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles for several migrating cell types identifies cell migration regulators.

Authors:  Young-Kyung Bae; Frank Macabenta; Heather Leigh Curtis; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Leading and trailing cells cooperate in collective migration of the zebrafish posterior lateral line primordium.

Authors:  Damian Dalle Nogare; Katherine Somers; Swetha Rao; Miho Matsuda; Michal Reichman-Fried; Erez Raz; Ajay B Chitnis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  The migrations of Drosophila muscle founders and primordial germ cells are interdependent.

Authors:  Vincent Stepanik; Leslie Dunipace; Young-Kyung Bae; Frank Macabenta; Jingjing Sun; Nathanie Trisnadi; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Live imaging reveals hub cell assembly and compaction dynamics during morphogenesis of the Drosophila testis niche.

Authors:  Lauren Anllo; Lindsey W Plasschaert; Justin Sui; Stephen DiNardo
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  The FGF8-related signals Pyramus and Thisbe promote pathfinding, substrate adhesion, and survival of migrating longitudinal gut muscle founder cells.

Authors:  Ingolf Reim; Dominik Hollfelder; Afshan Ismat; Manfred Frasch
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 8.  Collective Migrations of Drosophila Embryonic Trunk and Caudal Mesoderm-Derived Muscle Precursor Cells.

Authors:  Frank Macabenta; Zsuzsa Akos; Jingjing Sun; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Sticking to a plan: adhesion and signaling control spatial organization of cells within migrating collectives.

Authors:  Frank Macabenta; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Fgf regulates dedifferentiation during skeletal muscle regeneration in adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Alfonso Saera-Vila; Phillip E Kish; Alon Kahana
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.