Literature DB >> 22218318

Biotic interactions, rapid evolution, and the establishment of introduced species.

Emily I Jones1, Richard Gomulkiewicz.   

Abstract

The biotic environment can pose a challenge to introduced species; however, it is not known how rapid evolution in introduced and resident species influences the probability that the introduced species will become established. Here, we analyze the establishment phase of invasion with eco-evolutionary models of introduced species involved in predator-prey, mutualistic, or competitive interactions with a resident species. We find that, depending on the strength of the biotic interaction, establishment is impossible, guaranteed, or, in a narrow range, determined by genetic variation. Over this narrow range, rapid evolution of the introduced species always favors establishment, whereas resident evolution may either inhibit or facilitate establishment, depending on the interaction type. Coevolution can also either increase or decrease the chance of establishment, depending on the initial genotype frequencies as well as the interaction type. Our results suggest that the conditions under which genetic variation influences establishment success are limited, but they highlight the importance of considering the resident community's evolutionary response to introduced species as a component of its invasibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22218318     DOI: 10.1086/663678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

Review 1.  Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology.

Authors:  Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Revisiting Darwin's conundrum reveals a twist on the relationship between phylogenetic distance and invasibility.

Authors:  Emily I Jones; Scott L Nuismer; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid evolution of quantitative traits: theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Kopp; Sebastian Matuszewski
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Individual phenotypic variation reduces interaction strengths in a consumer-resource system.

Authors:  Jean P Gibert; Chad E Brassil
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Invasion and rapid adaptation of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) across the Hawaiian Archipelago.

Authors:  William C Rosenthal; Peter B McIntyre; Peter J Lisi; Robert B Prather; Kristine N Moody; Michael J Blum; James Derek Hogan; Sean D Schoville
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Coevolution and the effects of climate change on interacting species.

Authors:  Tobin D Northfield; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction.

Authors:  Lee A Rollins; Angela T Moles; Serena Lam; Robert Buitenwerf; Joanna M Buswell; Claire R Brandenburger; Habacuc Flores-Moreno; Knud B Nielsen; Ellen Couchman; Gordon S Brown; Fiona J Thomson; Frank Hemmings; Richard Frankham; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Rapid evolution of cooperation in group-living animals.

Authors:  Mathias Franz; Oliver Schülke; Julia Ostner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Plant evolution can mediate negative effects from honey bees on wild pollinators.

Authors:  James R D Milner; Elias H Bloom; David W Crowder; Tobin D Northfield
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.