Literature DB >> 22218314

Behavioral responses in structured populations pave the way to group optimality.

Erol Akçay1, Jeremy Van Cleve.   

Abstract

An unresolved controversy regarding social behaviors is exemplified when natural selection might lead to behaviors that maximize fitness at the social-group level but are costly at the individual level. Except for the special case of groups of clones, we do not have a general understanding of how and when group-optimal behaviors evolve, especially when the behaviors in question are flexible. To address this question, we develop a general model that integrates behavioral plasticity in social interactions with the action of natural selection in structured populations. We find that group-optimal behaviors can evolve, even without clonal groups, if individuals exhibit appropriate behavioral responses to each other's actions. The evolution of such behavioral responses, in turn, is predicated on the nature of the proximate behavioral mechanisms. We model a particular class of proximate mechanisms, prosocial preferences, and find that such preferences evolve to sustain maximum group benefit under certain levels of relatedness and certain ecological conditions. Thus, our model demonstrates the fundamental interplay between behavioral responses and relatedness in determining the course of social evolution. We also highlight the crucial role of proximate mechanisms such as prosocial preferences in the evolution of behavioral responses and in facilitating evolutionary transitions in individuality.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22218314     DOI: 10.1086/663691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  Cooperation and the common good.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; António M M Rodrigues
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.

Authors:  Erol Akçay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The genetical theory of social behaviour.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  On the origin of biological construction, with a focus on multicellularity.

Authors:  Jordi van Gestel; Corina E Tarnita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A scaling law of multilevel evolution: how the balance between within- and among-collective evolution is determined.

Authors:  Nobuto Takeuchi; Namiko Mitarai; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Hamilton's rule in economic decision-making.

Authors:  Moshe Levy; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Indirect genetic effects and the dynamics of social interactions.

Authors:  Barbora Trubenová; Sebastian Novak; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantitative genetic versions of Hamilton's rule with empirical applications.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Jason B Wolf; Edmund D Brodie; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Dynamical Structure of a Traditional Amazonian Social Network.

Authors:  Paul L Hooper; Simon DeDeo; Ann E Caldwell Hooper; Michael Gurven; Hillard S Kaplan
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.