Literature DB >> 22218298

Reconstruction of the subaxial cervical spine using lateral mass and facet screw instrumentation.

Mehmet Aydogan1, Meric Enercan, Azmi Hamzaoglu, Ahmet Alanay.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review article.
OBJECTIVE: To review the indications, technical details, and complications of lateral mass and transfacet mass fixation methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Potential advantages of rigid fixation in subaxial cervical spine have been defined as early mobilization, faster healing and fusion, and increased fusion rates. Lateral mass screw fixation has been the most popular fixation technique for posterior instrumentation. Transfacet screw fixation, on the other hand, is an alternative method less commonly used.
METHODS: Narrative and review of the literature.
RESULTS: Several different techniques aiming for the most safe and secure lateral mass screw fixation have been described by several different authors. Lateral mass screws provide rigid fixation and high fusion rates in patients with healthy bone. Complications are rare when patients' anatomy is well documented and proper technique is used. Transfacet screw fixation is another method less commonly used and with better biomechanical stability.
CONCLUSION: Lateral mass screw provides excellent 3-dimensional fixations from C3 to C7, and currently it is also the most commonly performed posterior fixation method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22218298     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824442eb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  Jie Tong; Wei Ji; Ruozhou Zhou; Zhiping Huang; Sheting Liu; Qingan Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Pseudarthrosis of the Cervical Spine: Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Dante Leven; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

4.  The "Skipped Segment Screw" Construct: An Alternative to Conventional Lateral Mass Fixation-Biomechanical Analysis in a Porcine Cervical Spine Model.

Authors:  Kedar Prashant Padhye; Yuvaraja Murugan; Raunak Milton; N Arunai Nambi Raj; Kenny Samuel David
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Wei Du; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Combined Posterior Transfacet Screw Fixation and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Unilateral Cervical Facet Fracture with Traumatic Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chen Jin; Ning Xie; Jianjie Wang; Yilong Ren; Qunfeng Guo; Lianshun Jia; Liming Cheng
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-01-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.