Literature DB >> 2221765

McBurney's point--fact or fiction?

O M Karim1, A E Boothroyd, J H Wyllie.   

Abstract

Anthropometric measurements were performed on 51 normal, supine, barium enema examinations to determine the position of the lower pole of the caecum and the base of the appendix relative to palpable bony landmarks (the anterior superior iliac spine and the symphysis pubis). Four quadrants were defined (iliac, umbilical, inguinal and pelvic) by the intersection of the right lateral line and the interspinous line (the line joining the left and right anterior superior iliac spines). The position of the lower pole of the caecum was iliac in 12%, inguinal in 37%, and pelvic in 51%. The appendix or appendix stump was visualised on 53% of the barium examinations. The position of the appendix was iliac in 15%, umbilical in 15%, inguinal in 11%, and pelvic in 59%. The positions of the lower pole of the caecum and base of the appendix are lower and more medial than previously described. 70% of appendices were found to lie inferior to the interspinous line, contrary to established surgical teaching, which assumes McBurney's point to be the surface landmark for the appendix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2221765      PMCID: PMC2499212     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  The Fowler-Weir approach to appendicectomy.

Authors:  A R Askew
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The Position of the Abdominal Viscera in healthy, young British and American Adults.

Authors:  R O Moody
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1927-01       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The Length and Position of the Vermiform Appendix: A Study of 4,680 Specimens.

Authors:  D C Collins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1932-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating.

Authors:  C McBurney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1894-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The cul-de-sac approach for appendectomy.

Authors:  A K Amir-Jahed
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A transverse lower abdominal appendectomy incision with minimal muscle derangement.

Authors:  C Jelenko; L P Davis
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-03

7.  Investigation and analysis of the position, fixation, length and embryology of the vermiform appendix.

Authors:  K Buschard; A Kjaeldgaard
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1973

8.  Pfannenstiel incision for appendicectomy in females.

Authors:  S A El-Boghdadly; K Abel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1984-01
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Segmental nerve damage during a McBurney's incision: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  C J Jacobs; W H Steyn; J M Boon
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Reappraisal of the classical abdominal anatomical landmarks using in vivo computerized tomography imaging.

Authors:  Ruchi Goyal; Anjali Aggarwal; Tulika Gupta; Ajay Gulati; Shallu Jaggi; S Ali Mirjalili; Daisy Sahni
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  CT guided appendicectomy incision: A prospective case series.

Authors:  Vijay Naraynsingh; Shravan S Teelucksingh; Sanjeeva Goli; Shariful Islam; Shamir Cawich; Yardesh Singh; Ravi Maharaj
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.