Literature DB >> 22216702

Comparison of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

Z Demetrashvili1, V Qerqadze, G Kamkamidze, G Topchishvili, L Lagvilava, T Chartholani, V Archvadze.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was the comparative analysis of the results of two surgical methods: tension-free repair by the Lichtenstein technique and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. In total 52 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to the two groups: Lichtenstein (28 patients) and TAPP (24 patients). Comparisons between these groups were done by several preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. For postoperative factors both short-term and long-term results were considered. Average operation time for Lichtenstein group was 59.6 +/- 9.9 minutes, compared with 64.4 +/- 8.4 minutes for TAPP patients (P = 0.068). In TAPP patients there was less pain in the postoperative period (P = 0.002) and fewer sick-leave days (13.4 +/- 1.7 versus 17.5 +/- 2.6 days; P < 0.001) and, correspondingly, faster recovery. In the Lichtenstein group a total of 4 postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, urinary retention) were observed, compared with 8 in the TAPP group (P = 0.19). Statistically significant difference was only by urinary retention (0 for Lichtenstein, 4 for TAPP; P = 0.039). There were no cases of hernia recurrence observed during the followup. Chronic pain developed in 5 patients from the Lichtenstein group (17.9%) and 2 patients from the TAPP group (8.3%; P = 0.28) more than 1 year after the operation; 4 Lichtenstein patients (14.3%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.2%; P = 0.23) more than 2 years after the operation; and 3 Lichtenstein patients (10.7%) and 1 TAPP patient (4.2%; P = 0.36) more than 3 years after the operation. For the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias, which are developed after use of conventional (nonmesh) methods, the first choice should be given to the laparoscopic method, especially for young, physically active, nonobese patients, and if there are any contraindications for the laparoscopy, the Lichtenstein approach should be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22216702     DOI: 10.9738/cc53.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  10 in total

Review 1.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 2.  Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Pisanu; M Podda; A Saba; G Porceddu; A Uccheddu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M Miserez; E Peeters; T Aufenacker; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; L N Jorgensen; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Clinical curative effect of Mesalt combined with Mepilex dressing in postoperative infection of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Zhenjun Liu; Zhonghua Xiong; Jiayu Wu; Fang Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-04-09

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for the treatment of multiple recurrent inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Hanh Minh Tran; Kim Tran; Marta Zajkowska; Vincent Lam; Wayne Hawthorne
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Single-port onlay mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernias after failed anterior and laparoscopic repairs.

Authors:  Hanh Tran; Kim Tran; Marta Zajkowska; Vincent Lam; Wayne J Hawthorne
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Aly Saber; Emad N Hokkam; Goda M Ellabban
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: A prospective study based on Herniamed Register.

Authors:  Pavol Klobusicky; Peter Feyerherd
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair-register-based comparison of the outcome.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; A Kuthe; M Hukauf; F Mayer; R Fortelny; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparo-endoscopic versus open recurrent inguinal hernia repair: should we follow the guidelines?

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; A Kuthe; B Stechemesser; R Lorenz; A Koch; W Reinpold; H Niebuhr; M Hukauf; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.