| Literature DB >> 22216124 |
Roi Dor1, Irby J Lovette, Rebecca J Safran, Shawn M Billerman, Gernot H Huber, Yoni Vortman, Arnon Lotem, Andrew McGowan, Matthew R Evans, Caren B Cooper, David W Winkler.
Abstract
Recent studies of several species have reported a latitudinal cline in the circadian clock gene, Clock, which influences rhythms in both physiology and behavior. Latitudinal variation in this gene may hence reflect local adaptation to seasonal variation. In some bird populations, there is also an among-individual association between Clock poly-Q genotype and clutch initiation date and incubation period. We examined Clock poly-Q allele variation in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica), a species with a cosmopolitan geographic distribution and considerable variation in life-history traits that may be influenced by the circadian clock. We genotyped Barn Swallows from five populations (from three subspecies) and compared variation at the Clock locus to that at microsatellite loci and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). We found very low variation in the Clock poly-Q region, as >96% of individuals were homozygous, and the two other alleles at this locus were globally rare. Genetic differentiation based on the Clock poly-Q locus was not correlated with genetic differentiation based on either microsatellite loci or mtDNA sequences. Our results show that high diversity in Clock poly-Q is not general across avian species. The low Clock variation in the background of heterogeneity in microsatellite and mtDNA loci in Barn Swallows may be an outcome of stabilizing selection on the Clock locus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22216124 PMCID: PMC3244424 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the Barn Swallow populations used in this study with sample sizes for the genetic markers used in this study.
| Population | Subspecies | Breeding latitude | Migratory behavior | Time of breeding | Breeding cycles | # of samples analyzed for | ||
|
| ND2 | Microsatellites | ||||||
| Israel |
| 32°55′N | No | Feb–Jun | 2 (3) | 49 | 31 | 178 |
| United Kingdom |
| 50°42′N | Yes | Apr–Sep | 2 | 49 | 30 | 62 |
| New York |
| 42°30′N | Yes | May–Aug | 2 | 49 | 31 | 41 |
| California |
| 38°N | Yes | May–Jul | 2 | 31 | 19 | 23 |
| Argentina |
| 38°30′S | Yes | Oct–Feb | 2 (3) | 52 | 63 | 63 |
Typical number of breeding cycles with maximum breeding cycles in parentheses.
Barn Swallows from Israel only move locally outside the breeding season.
Figure 1Amino acid alignment of avian CLOCK polyQ alleles.
Alignment includes sequences from Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica; Hr) together with published Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus; Cc), Great Tit (Parus Major; Pm), Bluethroat (Luscinia svecica; Ls) and Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor; Tb). For each sequence the species name and number of Clock poly-Q repeats are shown. The predicted protein sequences of Barn Swallow Clock poly-Q repeats only differ in the number of CAG codon (coded by Q) repeats (The first and last glutamine (Q) amino acids in the poly-Q repeat were coded by CAA codons). Q residues coded by CAA are underlined and lower-case Qs are within-population polymorphic site encoded by either CAA or CAG. Asterisk indicates identical amino acids in the poly-Q flanking region between the all sequences.
Clock poly-Q allele frequencies, number of alleles (k), mean allele size (with standard errors) and observed heterozygosities (H) for the five Barn Swallow populations used in this study.
| Population | Subspecies | N |
| Mean allele size (s.e.) | Allele proportion |
| ||
| Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | ||||||
| Israel |
| 49 | 3 | 6.96 (0.03) | 0.051 | 0.939 | 0.010 | 0.082 |
| United Kingdom |
| 49 | 2 | 6.99 (0.01) | 0.010 | 0.990 | 0.000 | 0.020 |
| New York |
| 49 | 2 | 7.01 (0.01) | 0.000 | 0.990 | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| California |
| 31 | 2 | 7.02 (0.02) | 0.000 | 0.984 | 0.016 | 0.032 |
| Argentina |
| 52 | 1 | 7.00 (0.00) | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
| 230 | 3 | 6.99 (0.01) | 0.013 | 0.980 | 0.007 | 0.030 | |
Allele frequencies did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for all populations (P>0.05).
Figure 2Between-populations pairwise genetic differentiation values (F) comparisons.
(A) Comparisons between mitochondrial haplotypes and microsatellite loci, (B) between Clock poly-Q locus and mitochondrial haplotypes and (C) between Clock poly-Q locus and microsatellite loci. Points in black represent comparisons between the erythrogaster subspecies to either the rustica or transitiva subspecies, while points in grey represent comparison within the erythrogaster subspecies and between the rustica and transitiva subspecies (which are mitochondrially intermixed).