Literature DB >> 2221605

Nonoperative management of small-bowel obstruction with endoscopic long intestinal tube placement.

C L Snyder1, K L Ferrell, R L Goodale, A S Leonard.   

Abstract

Intestinal obstruction remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. We reviewed the records of 77 patients with mechanical small-bowel obstruction who were treated with endoscopically and fluoroscopically placed Leonard long intestinal tube decompression. Most patients (59%) had failed a trial of nasogastric tube or Miller-Abbott tube decompression. Overall, 29 per cent of patients were able to resolve their obstruction with Leonard tube decompression alone. Subdivision of patients on the basis of the etiology of their obstruction demonstrated a much higher rate of success for tube decompression in adhesive obstruction (37%) versus malignant obstruction (12%) or inflammatory obstruction (no successes). Patients with radiographic and clinical evidence of complete intestinal obstruction were significantly less likely to respond to long intestinal tube treatment (13%). The long intestinal tube was easily passed in all patients. There were no complications of the intubation procedure in our series, and the incidence of tube-related complications was four per cent. We conclude that an initial period of long intestinal tube decompression allows a significant percentage of patients with mechanical small-bowel obstruction to be treated nonoperatively, particularly if a partial obstruction from postoperative adhesions is present. Patients who have failed a trial of nasogastric tube decompression and are poor operative risks should also be considered for long intestinal tube placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2221605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Chen; Feng Ji; Qi Lin; Yi-Peng Chen; Jian-Jiang Lin; Feng Ye; Ji-Ren Yu; Yi-Jun Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Who would avoid severe adverse events from nasointestinal tube in small bowel obstruction? A matched case-control study.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Jun-Rong Zhang; Shuai Chen; Ping Hou; Qing-Feng Chen; Zong-Qi Weng; Xin-Chang Shang-Guan; Bing-Qiang Lin; Xian-Qiang Chen
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 4.  Nasointestinal tubes versus nasogastric tubes in the management of small-bowel obstruction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xian-Wen Dong; Shi-Liang Huang; Zhou-Hua Jiang; Yu-Fei Song; Xue-Song Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.