Literature DB >> 22215881

Imaging assessment of desmoid tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis: is state-of-the-art 1.5 T MRI better than 64-MDCT?

A Sinha1, A Hansmann, S Bhandari, A Gupta, D Burling, S Rana, R K Phillips, S K Clark, V Goh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Desmoid tumour is a common extraintestinal manifestation of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who have undergone prophylactic colectomy. We aimed to determine whether MRI provides equivalent or better assessment of desmoid tumours than CT, the current first-line investigation.
METHODS: Following ethics approval and informed consent, FAP patients with known desmoid tumour underwent contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) and 1.5 T MRI (incorporating T(1) weighted, T(2) weighted, short tau inversion-recovery and T(1) weighted with contrast, axial, sagittal and coronal sequences). The number, site, size, local extent, tumour signal intensity and desmoid-to-aorta enhancement ratio were analysed.
RESULTS: MRI identified 23 desmoid tumours in 9 patients: 9 intra-abdominal desmoid (IAD) tumours, 10 abdominal wall desmoid (AWD) tumours and 4 extra-abdominal desmoid (EAD) tumours. CT identified only 21 desmoids; 1 EAD and 1 AWD were not identified. The two modalities were equivalent in terms of defining local extent of desmoid. Five IAD tumours involved the bowel, six caused ureteric compression and none compromised the proximal superior mesenteric artery. There was no difference in median desmoid size: 56.7 cm(2) (range 2-215 cm(2)) on MDCT and 56.3 cm(2) (3-215 cm(2)) on MRI (p=0.985). The mean MRI enhancement ratio, at 1.12 (standard deviation 0.43), was greater than the CT enhancement ratio, which was 0.48 (0.16) (p<0.0001). High signal intensity on T(2) MRI was associated with increased MRI enhancement ratio (p=0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is at least equivalent (and may be superior) to MDCT for the detection of desmoid tumours in FAP. Coupled with the advantage of avoiding radiation, it should be considered as the primary imaging modality for young FAP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215881      PMCID: PMC3474070          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/42420290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Risk factors predicting intra-abdominal desmoids in familial adenomatous polyposis: a single centre experience.

Authors:  A Sinha; P P Tekkis; K F Neale; R K S Phillips; S K Clark
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Surgery for large intra-abdominal desmoid tumors: report of four cases.

Authors:  S B Middleton; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Current ideas in desmoid tumours.

Authors:  N Julian H Sturt; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Surgical prophylaxis in familial adenomatous polyposis: do pre-existing desmoids outside the abdominal cavity matter?

Authors:  Ashish Sinha; Daniel C Gibbons; Robin K Phillips; Sue Clark
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Impact of screening examinations on survival in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  I Heiskanen; T Luostarinen; H J Järvinen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Case report. PET/CT appearance of desmoid tumour of the chest wall.

Authors:  F F Souza; F M Fennessy; Q Yang; A D van den Abbeele
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Desmoid tumour of the breast.

Authors:  Shaheel Chummun; Neil R McLean; S Abraham; M Youseff
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Can the MRI signal of aggressive fibromatosis be used to predict its behavior?

Authors:  G Castellazzi; D Vanel; A Le Cesne; C Le Pechoux; H Caillet; F Perona; S Bonvalot
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Results of national registration of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S Bülow
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Authors:  H F A Vasen; G Möslein; A Alonso; S Aretz; I Bernstein; L Bertario; I Blanco; S Bülow; J Burn; G Capella; C Colas; C Engel; I Frayling; W Friedl; F J Hes; S Hodgson; H Järvinen; J-P Mecklin; P Møller; T Myrhøi; F M Nagengast; Y Parc; R Phillips; S K Clark; M Ponz de Leon; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; J R Sampson; A Stormorken; S Tejpar; H J W Thomas; J Wijnen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic imaging and CEUS findings in a rare case of Desmoid-type fibromatosis. A case report.

Authors:  Massimo Valentino; Mauro Liberatore; Fabrizio Maghella; Valeria De Soccio; Carlo De Felice; Daniela Messineo; Francesco Maria Drudi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-21

2.  Desmoid tumors: clinical features and outcome of an unpredictable and challenging manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Marleny Novaes; Sérgio Carlos Nahas; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Management of aggressive fibromatosis.

Authors:  Zhijun Zhang; Jian Shi; Tao Yang; Tongjun Liu; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Imaging features of superficial and deep fibromatoses in the adult population.

Authors:  Eric A Walker; Jonelle M Petscavage; Pamela L Brian; Chika Iloanusi Logie; Kenneth M Montini; Mark D Murphey
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2012-06-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.