Literature DB >> 22215522

Review article: medical education research: an overview of methods.

Sylvain Boet1, Saroo Sharma, Joanne Goldman, Scott Reeves.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article provides clinician-teachers with an overview of the process necessary to move from an initial idea to the conceptualization and implementation of an empirical study in the field of medical education. This article will allow clinician-teachers to become familiar with educational research methodology in order to a) critically appraise education research studies and apply evidence-based education more effectively to their practice and b) initiate or collaborate in medical education research. SOURCE: This review uses relevant articles published in the fields of medicine, education, psychology, and sociology before October 2011. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The focus of the majority of research in medical education has been on reporting outcomes related to participants. There has been less assessment of patient care outcomes, resulting in informing evidence-based education to only a limited extent. This article explains the process necessary to develop a focused and relevant education research question and emphasizes the importance of theory in medical education research. It describes a range of methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, and concludes with a discussion of dissemination of research findings. A majority of studies currently use quantitative methods. This article highlights how further use of qualitative methods can provide insight into the nuances and complexities of learning and teaching processes.
CONCLUSIONS: Research in medical education requires several successive steps, from formulating the correct research question to deciding the method for dissemination. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages and should be chosen according to the question being asked and the specific goal of the study. Well-conducted education research should allow progression towards the important goal of using evidence-based education in our teaching and institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215522     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-011-9635-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  20 in total

1.  Manifesto for family medicine educational research.

Authors:  Charo Rodríguez; Gillian Bartlett-Esquilant; Miriam Boillat; Marion Dove; Roland Grad; Leonora Lalla; Pierre Pluye; Pierre-Paul Tellier; Howard Bergman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Developing a Tool to Assess Placement of Central Venous Catheters in Pediatrics Patients.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Fleming; Richard B Mink; Christoph Hornik; Amanda R Emke; Michael L Green; Katherine Mason; Toni Petrillo; Jennifer Schuette; M Hossein Tcharmtchi; Margaret Winkler; David A Turner
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-07

Review 3.  Resources for Educating, Training, and Mentoring All Physicians Providing Palliative Care.

Authors:  James Downar
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  An Analysis of Canadian Doctor of Pharmacy Student Experiences in Non-Traditional Student-Preceptor Models.

Authors:  Caitlin McIntyre; Cindy Natsheh; Kori Leblanc; Olavo Fernandes; Aleksandra Bjelajac Mejia; Lalitha Raman-Wilms; Karen Cameron
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  The role of simulation training in anesthesiology resident education.

Authors:  Kazuma Yunoki; Tetsuro Sakai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Pharmacy Resident Perspectives on the Layered Learning Practice Model.

Authors:  Nathan V Dang; Tiffany K Pon; Yvette M Hellier
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Flipping the Classroom in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew M King; Michael Gottlieb; Jennifer Mitzman; Tina Dulani; Stephanie J Schulte; David P Way
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-02

8.  A proposal for assessing study quality: Biomonitoring, Environmental Epidemiology, and Short-lived Chemicals (BEES-C) instrument.

Authors:  Judy S LaKind; Jon R Sobus; Michael Goodman; Dana Boyd Barr; Peter Fürst; Richard J Albertini; Tye E Arbuckle; Greet Schoeters; Yu-Mei Tan; Justin Teeguarden; Rogelio Tornero-Velez; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Improving the quality of palliative and terminal care in the hospital by a network of palliative care nurse champions: the study protocol of the PalTeC-H project.

Authors:  Frederika E Witkamp; Lia van Zuylen; Paul J van der Maas; Helma van Dijk; Carin C D van der Rijt; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvain Boet; M Dylan Bould; Lillia Fung; Haytham Qosa; Laure Perrier; Walter Tavares; Scott Reeves; Andrea C Tricco
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.