K Piontek1, S-U Kutscher, A König, N Leygraf. 1. Institut für Forensische Psychiatrie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr. 174, 45147 Essen, Deutschland. kristina.piontek@lvr.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of schizophrenic patients admitted to forensic hospitals according to section 63 of the German Criminal Code has increased continuously over the past years. Prior to admission to a forensic ward, two thirds of schizophrenic patients have been admitted to a general psychiatric institution at least once. Among other factors, forensic admission is seen as a consequence of insufficient pretreatment in general psychiatry. This study aims to identify differences regarding the history of treatment of forensic and general psychiatric patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. METHOD: The matched samples include 72 male patients from forensic wards and 72 male patients from general psychiatry diagnosed with schizophrenia. The history of psychiatric treatment was reconstructed by interviewing the patients as well as the outpatient psychiatrists and by analyzing these patients' medical records. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar risk factors, however, forensic patients had a higher number of previous convictions and were convicted more often for violent offences. Furthermore, the data indicate that forensic patients are less integrated into psychiatric care and showed a lower rate of treatment compliance prior to admission to a forensic ward. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide support for the arrangement of an intensive outpatient aftercare, especially for schizophrenic patients with comorbid substance abuse disorders and previous convictions for violent offences.
BACKGROUND: The number of schizophrenicpatients admitted to forensic hospitals according to section 63 of the German Criminal Code has increased continuously over the past years. Prior to admission to a forensic ward, two thirds of schizophrenicpatients have been admitted to a general psychiatric institution at least once. Among other factors, forensic admission is seen as a consequence of insufficient pretreatment in general psychiatry. This study aims to identify differences regarding the history of treatment of forensic and general psychiatricpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia. METHOD: The matched samples include 72 male patients from forensic wards and 72 male patients from general psychiatry diagnosed with schizophrenia. The history of psychiatric treatment was reconstructed by interviewing the patients as well as the outpatient psychiatrists and by analyzing these patients' medical records. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar risk factors, however, forensic patients had a higher number of previous convictions and were convicted more often for violent offences. Furthermore, the data indicate that forensic patients are less integrated into psychiatric care and showed a lower rate of treatment compliance prior to admission to a forensic ward. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide support for the arrangement of an intensive outpatient aftercare, especially for schizophrenicpatients with comorbid substance abuse disorders and previous convictions for violent offences.
Authors: Gillian Haddock; Christine Barrowclough; Jennifer J Shaw; Graham Dunn; Raymond W Novaco; Nicholas Tarrier Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Jeffrey A Lieberman; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Marvin S Swartz; Robert A Rosenheck; Diana O Perkins; Richard S E Keefe; Sonia M Davis; Clarence E Davis; Barry D Lebowitz; Joanne Severe; John K Hsiao Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245