PURPOSE: The frequency of interruptions in sedentary time (sedentary breaks) is an aspect of sedentary behaviors that may be associated with metabolic health outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe the change in the frequency of sedentary breaks during a 10-yr period from ages 5 to 15 yr. METHODS: The longitudinal Iowa Bone Development Study has collected accelerometry data at approximately 5, 8, 11, 13, and 15 yr. Data from participants who wore an accelerometer at least 10 h·d(-1) and 3 d per data collection episode were used (423 children at age 5 yr, 550 children at age 8 yr, 520 children at age 11 yr, 454 children at age 13 yr, and 344 children at age 15 yr). The frequency of sedentary breaks was determined based on accelerometry data and compared by weekday/weekend, period during the day, gender, and data collection episode. RESULTS: The frequency of sedentary breaks decreased by >200 times per day during a 10-yr period from ages 5 to 15 yr. Linear regression models estimated a 1.84-times-per-hour decrease per year for boys and a 2.04-times-per-hour decrease per year for girls (P values < 0.0001). Both boys and girls showed significantly fewer breaks on weekdays from morning to 3:00 p.m. than on weekends from morning to 3:00 p.m. (P values < 0.0001). The frequency of sedentary breaks was slightly higher among boys than among girls (gender difference ≤ 2 times per hour; P values < 0.01 at ages 11, 13, and 15 yr). CONCLUSIONS: Breaks in sedentary time notably decrease during childhood and adolescence. During school hours, boys and girls have fewer breaks in sedentary time than during any other period of weekday or weekend day.
PURPOSE: The frequency of interruptions in sedentary time (sedentary breaks) is an aspect of sedentary behaviors that may be associated with metabolic health outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe the change in the frequency of sedentary breaks during a 10-yr period from ages 5 to 15 yr. METHODS: The longitudinal Iowa Bone Development Study has collected accelerometry data at approximately 5, 8, 11, 13, and 15 yr. Data from participants who wore an accelerometer at least 10 h·d(-1) and 3 d per data collection episode were used (423 children at age 5 yr, 550 children at age 8 yr, 520 children at age 11 yr, 454 children at age 13 yr, and 344 children at age 15 yr). The frequency of sedentary breaks was determined based on accelerometry data and compared by weekday/weekend, period during the day, gender, and data collection episode. RESULTS: The frequency of sedentary breaks decreased by >200 times per day during a 10-yr period from ages 5 to 15 yr. Linear regression models estimated a 1.84-times-per-hour decrease per year for boys and a 2.04-times-per-hour decrease per year for girls (P values < 0.0001). Both boys and girls showed significantly fewer breaks on weekdays from morning to 3:00 p.m. than on weekends from morning to 3:00 p.m. (P values < 0.0001). The frequency of sedentary breaks was slightly higher among boys than among girls (gender difference ≤ 2 times per hour; P values < 0.01 at ages 11, 13, and 15 yr). CONCLUSIONS: Breaks in sedentary time notably decrease during childhood and adolescence. During school hours, boys and girls have fewer breaks in sedentary time than during any other period of weekday or weekend day.
Authors: Kathleen F Janz; Steven M Levy; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Marcia C Willing; John J Warren Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Ester Cerin; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kelly R Evenson; Diane J Catellier; Karminder Gill; Kristin S Ondrak; Robert G McMurray Journal: J Sports Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Kathleen F Janz; Soyang Kwon; Elena M Letuchy; Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Marcia C Willing; Steven M Levy Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Calum Mattocks; Andy Ness; Sam Leary; Kate Tilling; Stephen N Blair; Julian Shield; Kevin Deere; Joanne Saunders; Joanne Kirkby; George Davey Smith; Jonathan Wells; Nicholas Wareham; John Reilly; Chris Riddoch Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2008
Authors: Andrea Bankoski; Tamara B Harris; James J McClain; Robert J Brychta; Paolo Caserotti; Kong Y Chen; David Berrigan; Richard P Troiano; Annemarie Koster Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Xanne Janssen; Laura Basterfield; Kathryn N Parkinson; Mark S Pearce; Jessica K Reilly; Ashley J Adamson; John J Reilly Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Frøydis N Vik; Nanna Lien; Sveinung Berntsen; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Monika Grillenberger; Yannis Manios; Eva Kovacs; Mai J M Chinapaw; Johannes Brug; Elling Bere Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anisse Penning; Anthony D Okely; Stewart G Trost; Jo Salmon; Dylan P Cliff; Marijka Batterham; Steven Howard; Anne-Maree Parrish Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Eivind Aadland; Lars Bo Andersen; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen; Geir Kåre Resaland Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets; R Glenn Weaver; Russell R Pate; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Andrew T Kaczynski; Jessica L Chandler; Amy Bohnert; Paul T von Hippel Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ana María Contardo Ayala; Jo Salmon; Anna Timperio; Bronwyn Sudholz; Nicola D Ridgers; Parneet Sethi; David W Dunstan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zubaida Alghaeed; John J Reilly; Sebastien F M Chastin; Anne Martin; Gwyneth Davies; James Y Paton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240