INTRODUCTION: Large defects around the knee remain challenging reconstructive problems. We report our experience with the use of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap for various defects in this area, based on the anatomy seen intraoperatively. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight knee defects were reconstructed with the anterolateral thigh flap in accordance with our algorithm. Of them, 6 were performed as pedicled flaps and 2 as free flaps. For the pedicled flaps, 1 patient was reconstructed with an anterolateral thigh rotation flap, 3 patients with a directly transposed distally based anterolateral thigh flap, 2 patients with a "propeller" distally based anterolateral thigh flap. In the 2 patients reconstructed with the free anterolateral thigh flaps, the intramuscular part of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery was used as the recipient vessel. RESULTS: Reconstruction was successfully performed in all patients. Defects limited to the patella and above can be covered by antegrade anterolateral thigh rotation flaps. For larger defects, the distally based flap is needed. This can be used in cases where the perforators arise from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, either as a direct advancement or propeller flaps. In cases where the perforators are not usable or arises from the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, reconstruction was completed as a free flap. In such instances, the distal descending branch provides a reliable recipient vessel. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral thigh flap offers a versatile and reliable option for defects around the knee. Its use requires a certain degree of reconstructive flexibility as the anatomic variations of the flap may require the flap to be transferred as a free flap in some cases.
INTRODUCTION: Large defects around the knee remain challenging reconstructive problems. We report our experience with the use of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap for various defects in this area, based on the anatomy seen intraoperatively. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight knee defects were reconstructed with the anterolateral thigh flap in accordance with our algorithm. Of them, 6 were performed as pedicled flaps and 2 as free flaps. For the pedicled flaps, 1 patient was reconstructed with an anterolateral thigh rotation flap, 3 patients with a directly transposed distally based anterolateral thigh flap, 2 patients with a "propeller" distally based anterolateral thigh flap. In the 2 patients reconstructed with the free anterolateral thigh flaps, the intramuscular part of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery was used as the recipient vessel. RESULTS: Reconstruction was successfully performed in all patients. Defects limited to the patella and above can be covered by antegrade anterolateral thigh rotation flaps. For larger defects, the distally based flap is needed. This can be used in cases where the perforators arise from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, either as a direct advancement or propeller flaps. In cases where the perforators are not usable or arises from the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, reconstruction was completed as a free flap. In such instances, the distal descending branch provides a reliable recipient vessel. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral thigh flap offers a versatile and reliable option for defects around the knee. Its use requires a certain degree of reconstructive flexibility as the anatomic variations of the flap may require the flap to be transferred as a free flap in some cases.