Literature DB >> 22214602

Prospective study of the risk of not using prophylactic antibiotics in nasal packing for epistaxis.

C Pepper1, S Lo, A Toma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in UK prescribing practice regarding prophylactic antibiotics for nasal packing in spontaneous epistaxis. There are few published cases of infective complications in such patients.
METHOD: This prospective study examined 149 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary otorhinolaryngology centre with spontaneous epistaxis, who underwent nasal packing, over a six-month period. In the first three-month period, 78 patients were routinely prescribed prophylactic antibiotics; in the second three months, 71 patients were not routinely prescribed antibiotics. Exclusion criteria included antibiotics prescribed for unrelated pathology and post-operative epistaxis. Signs and symptoms of acute otitis media, sinusitis and toxic shock syndrome were assessed using clinical examination and a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 149 patients experienced otalgia, most commonly following posterior nasal packing. No patient in either group had evidence of any infective complication.
CONCLUSION: We do not recommend the routine prescription of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing nasal packing for spontaneous epistaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22214602     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215111003215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  3 in total

1.  Complications of balloon packing in epistaxis.

Authors:  Lenka Vermeeren; Wynia Derks; Wytske Fokkens; Dirk-Jan Menger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Transseptal suturing technique in septoplasty: impact on bacteremia and nosocomial colonization.

Authors:  Onur Ismi; Cengiz Ozcan; Yusuf Vayısoğlu; Candan Öztürk; Sebahat Aslan Tek; Kemal Görür
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of posterior epistaxis: a review.

Authors:  S W McClurg; R Carrau
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.