Literature DB >> 22213794

Temporary transvenous VDD pacing as a bridge to permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with sepsis and haemodynamically significant atrioventricular block.

Antoine Lepillier1, Akli Otmani, Xavier Waintraub, Jacky Ollitrault, Jeanyves Le Heuzey, Thomas Lavergne.   

Abstract

AIMS: Permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation is temporarily contraindicated in patients (pts) with sepsis. In patients with symptomatic atrioventricular (AV) block and infection, prolonged VVI pacing is therefore usually ensured by a ventricular pacing lead (PL) connected to an external PM generator. In patients with normal sinus function and heart failure, the VVI mode can exacerbate haemodynamic dysfunction. A single AV PL can be attractive to achieve physiological pacing. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of temporary VDD pacing as a bridge to permanent PM implantation in patients with complete AV block until control of infection. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study included eight patients with complete AV block and sepsis with negative blood culture. Due to the presence of congestive heart failure, a single bipolar AV PL connected to an external VDD PM generator. At VDD implantation, P-wave amplitude was 1.9 ± 1.6 mV and R-wave was 11.3 ± 5.2 mV. The ventricular pacing threshold was 0.53 ± 0.1 V for a 0.5 ms pulse. Antibiotic therapy was instituted in all patients. A permanent VDD or DDD PM was implanted after 8 ± 2.5 days of temporary VDD pacing. At permanent PM implantation, the mean brain natriuretic peptide level had decreased and sepsis was controlled in all patients. No recurrence of sepsis was observed with a mean follow-up of 15.8 ± 5.3 months.
CONCLUSION: Temporary VDD pacing is a safe and effective method to achieve prolonged AV physiological pacing in patients with AV block until infection has been controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22213794     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  [Pacemaker dependant and/or repetitive ICD therapies. How to solve the dilemma of lead extraction?].

Authors:  Viviane Möller; Frank Hölschermann; Thomas Schau; Christian Butter
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-08-17

Review 2.  A Review of Temporary Permanent Pacemakers and a Comparison with Conventional Temporary Pacemakers.

Authors:  Keith Suarez; Javier E Banchs
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-05-15

3.  Working on the dirty side-the ipsilateral subclavian access for temporary pacing after lead extraction.

Authors:  David Zweiker; Francesco Melillo; Giuseppe D'Angelo; Andrea Radinovic; Alessandra Marzi; Lorenzo Cianfanelli; Savino Altizio; Luca R Limite; Gabriele Paglino; Antonio Frontera; Kenzaburo Nakajima; Luigia Brugliera; Lorenzo Malatino; Paolo Della Bella; Patrizio Mazzone
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Temporary transvenous atrioventricular synchronous pacing using a single lead in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Robert Whitehill; Peter Fischbach; Jessica Posey; Fawwaz Shaw; Chad Mao
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.