Literature DB >> 22213407

Using Simcyp to project human oral pharmacokinetic variability in early drug research to mitigate mechanism-based adverse events.

Christopher L Shaffer1, Renato J Scialis, Haojing Rong, R Scott Obach.   

Abstract

Positive allosteric modulators ('potentiators') of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) have been shown to display a mechanism-based exposure-response continuum in preclinical species with procognitive electrophysiological and behavioral effects ('efficacy') at low exposures and motor coordination disruptions at progressively higher exposures. Due to the dose-capping nature of such motor coordination deficits, an exposure threshold-mediated adverse event (C(AE) ), the adequacy of separation between the maximal total plasma compound concentration (C(max) ) at a predicted clinically efficacious oral dose and this adverse event (AE) was explored in early drug research with three AMPAR potentiators considered potential candidates for clinical trials. In vitro metabolism studies in human liver microsomes and human hepatocytes demonstrated the metabolic clearance for each compound was predominately due to cytochromes P450 (CYP). Thus, for each compound's anticipated clinically efficacious dose, human C(max) variability following oral administration was assessed using Simcyp software, which combines its virtual human populations database using extensive demographic, physiological and genomic information with routinely collected compound-specific in vitro biochemical data to simulate and predict drug disposition. Using a combination of experimentally determined recombinant human CYP intrinsic clearances for CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, human binding factors, expected fraction absorbed and estimated steady-state volume of distribution, Simcyp simulations demonstrated that two of the three potentiators had acceptable projected C(max) variability (i.e. the 95th percentile C(max) did not breach C(AE) ). This evaluation aided in the selection of compounds for preclinical progression, and represents a novel application of pharmacologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) software approaches to predict interpatient variability.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22213407     DOI: 10.1002/bdd.1768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos        ISSN: 0142-2782            Impact factor:   1.627


  2 in total

1.  Case studies for practical food effect assessments across BCS/BDDCS class compounds using in silico, in vitro, and preclinical in vivo data.

Authors:  Tycho Heimbach; Binfeng Xia; Tsu-han Lin; Handan He
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Are Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Reporting the Right C(max)? Central Venous Versus Peripheral Sampling Site.

Authors:  Helen Musther; Katherine L Gill; Manoranjenni Chetty; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Malcolm Rowland; Masoud Jamei
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.