Literature DB >> 22212747

DNA damage induced by mammography in high family risk patients: only one single view in screening.

Catherine Colin1, Nicolas Foray.   

Abstract

Women with high risk of breast or ovarian cancers might be more susceptible to radiation-induced cancer because most of tumor suppressor genes are also implicated in the radio-induced DNA damage repair and signaling. Recent radiobiological advances may help to re-consider the potential cellular and molecular consequences of the standard two-view mammographic screening. A major radiobiological effect exacerbated in high family risk women caused by mammographic repeated doses was pointed out on relevant cellular model (untransformed and non tumoral human breast epithelial cells): the Low and Repeated Dose (LORD) effect. In parallel, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is reported to be less sensitive than mammography for detection of ductal carcinoma in situ, a recent study highlighted the increased ability of MRI to detect them related to the experience both of radiologists and MRI centers. Hence, along with studies confirming improvement of the sensitivity of MRI to detect ductal carcinoma in situ, the supra-additivity effect induced by the two-view mammographic screening in high family risk patients suggests that mammographic exposures can be limited seriously. Consequently, a single view (oblique) per breast in association with annual MRI, with the sole aim to detect calcifications reflecting carcinoma in situ non detectable by MRI, might represent currently a compromise.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22212747     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  6 in total

1.  Optimization of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography depending on clinical indication.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Sandra Canale; Sylvie Saab-Puong; Ann-Katherine Carton; Serge Muller; Eva Maria Fallenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-30

2.  Significant Suppression of CT Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Normal Human Cells by the PrC-210 Radioprotector.

Authors:  Frank Jermusek; Chelsea Benedict; Emma Dreischmeier; Michael Brand; Michael Uder; Justin J Jeffery; Frank N Ranallo; William E Fahl
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Reduction of X-ray-induced DNA damage in normal human cells treated with the PrC-210 radioprotector.

Authors:  Michael Brand; Matthias Sommer; Frank Jermusek; William E Fahl; Michael Uder
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  X-ray induced formation of γ-H2AX foci after full-field digital mammography and digital breast-tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Siegfried A Schwab; Michael Brand; Ina-Kristin Schlude; Wolfgang Wuest; Martina Meier-Meitinger; Luitpold Distel; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Michael Uder; Michael A Kuefner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.

Authors:  Ernest K J Pauwels; Nicolas Foray; Michel H Bourguignon
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8-26 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; C John Kotre; Elaine Harkness; Mary Wilson; Anthony J Maxwell; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.