Literature DB >> 22210931

Ethics for the pediatrician: obstetric conflict: when fetal and maternal interests are at odds.

Susan F Townsend1.   

Abstract

The interests of the fetus generally are aligned with those of the pregnant woman. When they are not, the fetal best interests should be discussed, but respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman and her bodily integrity should prevail. Gender bias and discrimination toward women should be avoided, and the circumstance of pregnancy should not be used as a reason to infringe upon or limit a competent woman’s rights. Evidence indicates that providing prenatal care and treatment in a supportive, rather than coercive way is the most effective way to promote both maternal and child health. Concerns about potential harm to the fetus related to maternal decisions must be evaluated in the context of the best medical evidence, including what is known and what is uncertain. Threats or legal coercion should not be used to force treatment, in particular, to impose cesarean delivery. Hospital guidelines can be developed to support a framework of shared decision-making in the situation of maternal-fetal conflict and provide guidance for compassionate conflict resolution. Pediatricians have an important role in informing the discussion about care and outcomes. At times, an ethics consult maybe helpful to mediate conflict resolution. Intervention by the courts is rarely appropriate or indicated and should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22210931     DOI: 10.1542/pir.33-1-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Rev        ISSN: 0191-9601


  6 in total

1.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: SHIFTING RISK MANAGEMENT IN AMERICAN CHILDBIRTH.

Authors:  Kellie Owens
Journal:  Adv Med Sociol       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 2.  Ethics of studies of drugs in pregnancy.

Authors:  Doreen Matsui
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Antepartum severe maternal morbidity: A population-based study of risk factors and delivery outcomes.

Authors:  Mégane Raineau; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Aurélien Seco; Marie-Pierre Bonnet
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Evaluation of pediatric residents' attitudes toward ethical conflict: a cross-sectional study in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Maliheh Kadivar; Marjan Mardani-Hamooleh; Shiva Shayestefar
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Reviewing the womb.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chloe Romanis; Dunja Begović; Margot R Brazier; Alexandra Katherine Mullock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.