| Literature DB >> 22210486 |
Akhilesh V Singh1, Lila K Nath.
Abstract
The present investigation concerns with the development of controlled release tablets of lamivudine using acetylated moth bean starch. The acetylated starch was synthesized with acetic anhydride in pyridine medium. The acetylated moth bean starch was tested for acute toxicity and drug-excipient compatibility study. The formulations were evaluated for physical characteristics like hardness, friability, % drug content and weight variations. The in vitro release study showed that the optimized formulation exhibited highest correlation (R) value in case of Higuchi kinetic model and the release mechanism study proved that the formulation showed a combination of diffusion and erosion process. There was a significant difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), C(max), AUC, V(d), T(1/2) and MDT) of the optimized formulation as compared to the marketed conventional tablet Lamivir(®), which proved controlled release potential of acetylated moth bean starch.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22210486 PMCID: PMC3281192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.12.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Macromol ISSN: 0141-8130 Impact factor: 6.953
Corresponding peak temperatures and enthalpy values of lamivudine in various drug–excipient mixtures in DSC study.
| Sample | Ratio (drug:excipient) | ΔH (J g−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAM | – | 177 40 | 182 73 | 74 54 |
| LAM + AMBS | 1:1 | 177.58 | 183.79 | 101.76 |
| LAM + PVP K-30 | 1:1 | 174.32 | 180.09 | 72.43 |
| LAM + SDL | 1:1 | 171.56 | 179.44 | 48.78 |
| LAM + Magnesium stearate | 1:1 | 177.63 | 182.91 | 80.66 |
| LAM + Talc | 1:1 | 178.64 | 183.32 | 98.38 |
Results of UV analysis of the drug–excipient mixtures, under isothermal stress testing after 4 weeks of storage.
| Sample | Ratio (drug:excipient) | % Drug remaining | Change in physical appearance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Stressed | |||
| LAM | – | 101.12 ± 3.2 | 99.97 ± 3.1 | No |
| LAM + AMBS | 1:2 | 103.36 ± 2.5 | 101.12 ± 1.6 | No |
| LAM + SDL | 1:2 | 102.51 ± 2.1 | 102.34 ± 0.7 | No |
| LAM + PVP | 1:1 | 103.67 ± 2.2 | 101.87 ± 1.1 | No |
| LAM + Magnesium Steanate | 1:1 | 101.45 ± 1.5 | 100.12 ± 2.2 | No |
| LAM + Talc | 1:1 | 101.22 ± 4.1 | 100.02 ± 1.1 | No |
Values expressed as average ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Drug excipient blends without added water and stored in refrigerator.
Drug excipient blends with 10% added water and stored at 50 °C for 4 weeks.
Composition of lamivudine controlled release tablet using AMBS.
| Ingredients (mg) | Formulation code | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | |
| Lamivudine | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Acetylated moth bean starch | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | 175 | 200 |
| PVP K-30 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Spray dried lactose | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. | q.s. |
| Magnesium stearate | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Talc | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Total weight | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
q.s., quantity sufficient.
Physical properties of lamivudine CR tablets using AMBS as release retardant.
| Batches | Drug content (%) | Weight deviation (%) | Hardness (kg/cm2) | Friability (%) | Thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 101.2 ± 2.1 | 402 ± 1.4 | 8.1 ± 1.4 | 0.65 ± 1.3 | 4.66 ± 0.5 |
| F2 | 99.98 ± 1.4 | 398 ± 0.8 | 8.3 ± 1.7 | 0.45 ± 1.7 | 4.65 ± 1.2 |
| F3 | 100.56 ± 1.3 | 403 ± 1.2 | 8.2 ± 2.1 | 0.43 ± 1.1 | 4.67 ± 1.4 |
| F4 | 102.12 ± 0.9 | 405 ± 1.7 | 8.3 ± 2.0 | 0.34 ± 1.7 | 4.66 ± 2.1 |
| F5 | 101.6 ± 1.2 | 401 ± 1.4 | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 0.36 ± 1.5 | 4.63 ± 2.2 |
| F6 | 99.98 ± 1.4 | 397 ± 1.1 | 8.2 ± 1.1 | 0.29 ± 1.4 | 4.61 ± 1.1 |
| F7 | 103.1 ± 1.6 | 409 ± 2.1 | 8.3 ± 2.1 | 0.27 ± 1.2 | 4.62 ± 1.8 |
| F8 | 101.2 ± 1.5 | 401 ± 1.5 | 8.2 ± 1.9 | 0.26 ± 0.21 | 4.64 ± 1.4 |
All values represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Fig. 1In vitro dissolution rate profile of all the batches of tablets.
Comparative release kinetics parameter of all batches of tablets.
| Formulation code | Release kinetic parameters | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero order | First order | Higuchi | Korsemeyer & Peppas | |||||
| F1 | 0.8611 | 25.2 | 0.9238 | −0.57 | 0.9616 | 53.86 | 0.8896 | 0.591 |
| F2 | 0.8978 | 19.9 | 0.9601 | −0.42 | 0.9764 | 8.03 | 0.9566 | 0.624 |
| F3 | 0.8909 | 16.6 | 0.9531 | −0.32 | 0.9674 | 4.47 | 0.9536 | 0.657 |
| F4 | 0.9136 | 14.11 | 0.9549 | −0.29 | 0.9784 | 1.14 | 0.9748 | 0.653 |
| F5 | 0.9159 | 12.46 | 0.9561 | −0.25 | 0.9723 | 9.16 | 0.972 | 0.702 |
| F6 | 0.9197 | 9.9 | 0.9115 | −0.20 | 0.9753 | 5.43 | 0.9771 | 0.701 |
| F7 | 0.9619 | 8.08 | 0.896 | −0.15 | 0.9813 | 1.98 | 0.995 | 0.719 |
| F8 | 0.9589 | 6.42 | 0.9991 | −0.05 | 0.9782 | 5.29 | 0.992 | 0.762 |
Pharmacokinetic parameters of marketed and optimized lamivudine controlled release tablet (F7) after a single oral dose of 100 mg lamivudine to rabbits (n = 3).
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Observed value (Lamivir®) | Observed value (F7) |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum plasma concentration, | 12,784.91 ± 2.1 | 8342.56 ± 3.4 |
| Time required to reach maximum plasma concentration, | 1.00 ± 1.6 | 4.00 ± 2.2 |
| Area under curve at 24 h, AUC(0 → ∞) (ng h/mL) | 54,206.284 ± 3.7 | 57,075.323 ± 4.5 |
| Area under momentum curve at 24 h, AUMC(0 → ∞) (ng h2/mL) | 227,067.968 ± 0.6 | 306,847.633 ± 1.2 |
| Volume of distribution, | 9.574 ± 2.8 | 16.910 ± 3.1 |
| Plasma half life, | 3.594 ± 0.2 | 6.690 ± 4.1 |
| Absorption rate constant, | 2.142 ± 1.8 | 0.796 ± 1.0 |
| Elimination rate constant, | 0.193 ± 1.5 | 0.105 ± 2.4 |
| Mean residence time, MRT (h) | 4.189 ± 2.1 | 5.376 ± 2.1 |
| Clearance, Cl (L/h) | 1.846 ± 3.0 | 1.753 ± 1.7 |
Fig. 2Comparative in vivo pharmacokinetic study of marketed conventional tablet of Lamivir® and optimized formulation (F7).